Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Queen Mary University of London currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
7 claim records
Queen Mary staff guidance says open-access GenAI tools are not secure for institutional data, and directs staff to use institutional Microsoft Copilot for sensitive, confidential, or internal-use-only information while not sharing internal-use Queen Mary data with external AI tools.
Queen Mary student guidance says any use of Generative AI must align with the Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy, and that AI use may be acceptable in some scenarios but not all.
Queen Mary Doctoral College guidance tells postgraduate researchers to decide with supervisors which GenAI systems to use and why, keep detailed records of inputs and outputs, and reference and declare GenAI use in their work.
Queen Mary IT FAQs say staff using built-in Copilot with a Queen Mary account get Microsoft 365 environment protections, and inputs are not stored or used for external model training.
Queen Mary publishes an official AI education guidance page that links AI principles, staff guidance, student guidance, PGR guidance, academic integrity resources, and the Policy Zone rather than presenting the guidance page itself as a standalone binding AI policy.
Queen Mary IT FAQs say staff intending to use Queen Mary data with a free AI tool must submit the tool for approval through the Ideas portal before using it.
Queen Mary’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy applies to all Queen Mary students and says actions undermining academic integrity may be misconduct in assessment or learning activities, including formative assessment.
6 source attributions
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:15 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:15 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:15 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:15 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:15 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:15 AM