public-release-20260715-005
Compared with public-release-20260714-002.
Queen Mary University of London public-release-20260715-005 diff
Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Queen Mary University of London currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 7 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: Jul 19, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 1 source snapshot changes.
This page combines all public release diffs for Queen Mary University of London. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.
1 public release diff
Compared with public-release-20260714-002.
Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.
8 claim records
Built-in Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for Queen Mary University of London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Queen Mary staff guidance says open-access GenAI tools are not secure for institutional data, and directs staff to use institutional Microsoft Copilot for sensitive, confidential, or internal-use-only information while not sharing internal-use Queen Mary data with external AI tools.
Queen Mary student guidance says any use of Generative AI must align with the Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy, and that AI use may be acceptable in some scenarios but not all.
Queen Mary Doctoral College guidance tells postgraduate researchers to decide with supervisors which GenAI systems to use and why, keep detailed records of inputs and outputs, and reference and declare GenAI use in their work.
Queen Mary IT FAQs say staff using built-in Copilot with a Queen Mary account get Microsoft 365 environment protections, and inputs are not stored or used for external model training.
Queen Mary publishes an official AI education guidance page that links AI principles, staff guidance, student guidance, PGR guidance, academic integrity resources, and the Policy Zone rather than presenting the guidance page itself as a standalone binding AI policy.
Queen Mary IT FAQs say staff intending to use Queen Mary data with a free AI tool must submit the tool for approval through the Ideas portal before using it.
Queen Mary’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy applies to all Queen Mary students and says actions undermining academic integrity may be misconduct in assessment or learning activities, including formative assessment.
7 source attributions
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:15 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:15 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at Jul 16, 2026, 12:01 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:15 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:15 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:15 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 5:15 AM