Policy presence
Queen Mary University of London has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
London, United Kingdom
Queen Mary University of London has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Queen Mary University of London has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Queen Mary University of London has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Queen Mary University of London has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Queen Mary University of London has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Queen Mary University of London has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Queen Mary University of London has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Queen Mary University of London has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Queen Mary University of London has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Queen Mary University of London has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Normalized value: Staff guidance directs sensitive/internal Queen Mary data to institutional Copilot, not external AI tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1It’s important to remember that data entered into open-access GenAI tools - including widely used platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and others - is not secure. Use Microsoft Copilot when working with sensitive, confidential, or internal-use-only information. Do not share any Queen Mary data designated for internal use with external AI tools.
Localized display only
For staff, sensitive, confidential, or internal-use Queen Mary information should use institutional Copilot; internal-use data should not be shared with external AI tools.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: Student GenAI use must align with Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy; acceptable uses vary by scenario
Original evidence
Evidence 1Any use of Generative AI must align with Queen Mary’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy. AI use may be acceptable in some scenarios, but not all.
Localized display only
Students are told GenAI use must align with the Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy and may be acceptable only in some scenarios.
Research
Normalized value: PGR GenAI use should be planned with supervisors, recorded, referenced, and declared
Original evidence
Evidence 1With your supervisors, decide which system(s) you will use, why you will use them, and how you will use them. Keep detailed records of your inputs and outputs. Reference GenAI information and declare its use in your work.
Localized display only
PGRs are guided to plan GenAI use with supervisors and keep records of inputs and outputs.
Privacy
Normalized value: Built-in Copilot with Queen Mary account keeps data in Microsoft 365 environment and does not use inputs for external model training
Original evidence
Evidence 1The green shield icon confirms you’re using the Queen Mary secure version of Copilot. This means: Your data stays within the Queen Mary’s Microsoft 365 environment. It meets institutional security and data protection requirements. Inputs are not stored or used for external model training.
Localized display only
Queen Mary describes the signed-in, green-shield Copilot experience as keeping data within its Microsoft 365 environment and not using inputs for external model training.
Source Status
Normalized value: Official AI education guidance hub links staff, student, PGR, academic integrity, and policy-zone resources
Original evidence
Evidence 1Our innovative use of AI in education is supported by policy and guidance for educators and students. Guidance for staff and students: Staff Guide to Generative AI; Student Guide to Generative AI; Academic Integrity at Queen Mary; AI for student learning and research; AI guidance for PGRs.
Localized display only
Queen Mary frames AI in education as supported by policy and guidance, and links staff, student, PGR, academic integrity and Policy Zone resources.
Procurement
Normalized value: Free AI tools involving Queen Mary data require pre-use approval via Ideas portal
Original evidence
Evidence 1If you intend to use Queen Mary data (such as staff, student, research, or confidential information) with a free tool, you must submit the tool for approval via the Ideas portal – Software Request before you start using the tool
Localized display only
For free AI tools involving Queen Mary data, the FAQ requires approval through the Ideas portal before use.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy applies to all students and can cover assessment or learning activities including formative assessment
Original evidence
Evidence 1The Academic Integrity & Misconduct Policy applies to all students at Queen Mary. Academic Integrity is essential in all areas of academic life. Actions that undermine integrity may be considered misconduct in any assessment or activity, including formative assessment or learning activities.
Localized display only
The academic integrity policy applies to all students and may cover misconduct in assessments or learning activities, including formative work.
0 machine or needs-review claim
6 source attribution
qmul.ac.uk
qmul.ac.uk
qmul.ac.uk
qmul.ac.uk
qmul.ac.uk
qmul.ac.uk