source_status
AUS policy applies to undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments and says faculty research use of generative AI tools is not covered by this policy.
审核: 智能体已审核
变更日志
American University of Sharjah
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
变更摘要
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
American University of Sharjah currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月16日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 American University of Sharjah。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
差异类别
此版本差异的语义分类。
组合版本差异
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
American University of Sharjah combined release 差异
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+12-0
11 # American University of Sharjah AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
3+Evidence (en, b4ff98fde12d): Students are forbidden from using GAI tools to produce any work for assessment unless that use is explicitly permitted by the course instructor.
4+teaching: AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
5+Evidence (en, b4ff98fde12d): Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
6+academic_integrity: AUS policy says students must acknowledge generative AI tool use in submitted course-credit material, including the tool name and version number.
7+Evidence (en, b4ff98fde12d): Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
8+ai_tool_treatment: AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
9+Evidence (en, b4ff98fde12d): Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
10+academic_integrity: AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
11+Evidence (en, b4ff98fde12d): The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
12+source_status: AUS policy applies to undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments and says faculty research use of generative AI tools is not covered by this policy.
13+Evidence (en, b4ff98fde12d): All undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments at AUS. The use of GAI tools in faculty research is not covered under this policy.
版本历史
0 public release diffs
声明变更
6 声明 条记录
academic_integrity
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
审核: 智能体已审核
ai_tool_treatment
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
审核: 智能体已审核
academic_integrity
AUS policy says students must acknowledge generative AI tool use in submitted course-credit material, including the tool name and version number.
审核: 智能体已审核
teaching
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
审核: 智能体已审核
academic_integrity
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
审核: 智能体已审核
源快照
2 source attributions
0.f. Generative AI (GAI) Tools in Teaching and Learning Policy
official_pdf Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 04:18
AUS AI Policy
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 04:19