source_status
AUS policy applies to undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments and says faculty research use of generative AI tools is not covered by this policy.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
American University of Sharjah
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
American University of Sharjah currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for American University of Sharjah. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
American University of Sharjah combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+12-0
11 # American University of Sharjah AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
3+Evidence (en, b4ff98fde12d): Students are forbidden from using GAI tools to produce any work for assessment unless that use is explicitly permitted by the course instructor.
4+teaching: AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
5+Evidence (en, b4ff98fde12d): Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
6+academic_integrity: AUS policy says students must acknowledge generative AI tool use in submitted course-credit material, including the tool name and version number.
7+Evidence (en, b4ff98fde12d): Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
8+ai_tool_treatment: AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
9+Evidence (en, b4ff98fde12d): Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
10+academic_integrity: AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
11+Evidence (en, b4ff98fde12d): The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
12+source_status: AUS policy applies to undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments and says faculty research use of generative AI tools is not covered by this policy.
13+Evidence (en, b4ff98fde12d): All undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments at AUS. The use of GAI tools in faculty research is not covered under this policy.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
6 claim records
academic_integrity
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
AUS policy says students must acknowledge generative AI tool use in submitted course-credit material, including the tool name and version number.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
2 source attributions
0.f. Generative AI (GAI) Tools in Teaching and Learning Policy
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:18 AM
AUS AI Policy
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:19 AM