academic_integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.
審閱: 代理已審閱
變更紀錄
University of Luxembourg
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
變更摘要
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
5 條當前主張；2 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異，適用於 University of Luxembourg。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見，亦非學術誠信建議；除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁，否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目，不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變，本身並不等同於政策變動。
差異類別
此次版本差異的語意分類。
已記錄的文本比對
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
發布歷程
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
當前 Claim 記錄
現行主張紀錄：5。
ai_tool_treatment
University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
審閱: 代理已審閱
academic_integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.
審閱: 代理已審閱
academic_integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.
審閱: 代理已審閱
academic_integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
審閱: 代理已審閱
來源快照
官方來源紀錄：2。
Chatbots and student assessment
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 16, 2026, 6:36 PM
Guidelines on the Use of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 16, 2026, 6:36 PM