變更紀錄
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
5 條當前主張；4 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異，適用於 University of Hohenheim。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見，亦非學術誠信建議；除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁，否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目，不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變，本身並不等同於政策變動。
此次版本差異的語意分類。
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
現行主張紀錄：5。
University of Hohenheim guidance says generative AI systems are generally permitted as aids in unsupervised written exams such as term papers, seminar papers, and theses when their use does not conflict with the exam purpose; the examiner or module supervisor decides for the specific assessment.
University of Hohenheim guidance warns that third-party data may not be passed into AI systems without consent and says personal, confidential, or otherwise sensitive data generally must not be fed into AI systems.
When generative AI tools are permitted for written work, University of Hohenheim materials say students submit an AI-use declaration in addition to the usual declaration of originality, with the exact contents determined by the examiner.
Hohenheim KIM describes GPTalk as a university-internal AI chat service for university members that provides browser-based access to modern language models, including OpenAI ChatGPT and open-source models, without requiring an external account.
The GPTalk guide tells students not to use GPTalk as their sole source, to enter no personal data, to remain responsible for the content as authors, and to make AI use transparent; it also says lecturers may not use GPTalk to correct or assess student work.
官方來源紀錄：4。
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 18, 2026, 5:41 AM
official_pdf 追蹤器檢查於 May 18, 2026, 5:41 AM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 18, 2026, 5:41 AM
official_pdf 追蹤器檢查於 May 18, 2026, 5:42 AM
