变更日志
本站历史：0 次发布记录。
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
当前收录 5 条主张、4 个官方来源。
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 University of Hohenheim。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。
本站不提供法律或学术诚信建议；除链接指向大学官方页面的来源外，本站内容不代表大学官方声明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
仅展示已记录且 Claim ID 精确匹配的文字对照。
本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。
本站历史：0 次发布记录。
当前条款记录：5 条。
University of Hohenheim guidance says generative AI systems are generally permitted as aids in unsupervised written exams such as term papers, seminar papers, and theses when their use does not conflict with the exam purpose; the examiner or module supervisor decides for the specific assessment.
University of Hohenheim guidance warns that third-party data may not be passed into AI systems without consent and says personal, confidential, or otherwise sensitive data generally must not be fed into AI systems.
When generative AI tools are permitted for written work, University of Hohenheim materials say students submit an AI-use declaration in addition to the usual declaration of originality, with the exact contents determined by the examiner.
Hohenheim KIM describes GPTalk as a university-internal AI chat service for university members that provides browser-based access to modern language models, including OpenAI ChatGPT and open-source models, without requiring an external account.
The GPTalk guide tells students not to use GPTalk as their sole source, to enter no personal data, to remain responsible for the content as authors, and to make AI use transparent; it also says lecturers may not use GPTalk to correct or assess student work.
官方来源记录：4 条。
official_guidance 本站检查时间 2026年5月18日 05:41
official_pdf 本站检查时间 2026年5月18日 05:41
official_guidance 本站检查时间 2026年5月18日 05:41
official_pdf 本站检查时间 2026年5月18日 05:42
