University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

APIGitHub

Change log

University of Hohenheim

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Claims5Sources4
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Hohenheim currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 18, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of Hohenheim current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+10-0
11 # University of Hohenheim AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: University of Hohenheim guidance says generative AI systems are generally permitted as aids in unsupervised written exams such as term papers, seminar papers, and theses when their use does not conflict with the exam purpose; the examiner or module supervisor decides for the specific assessment.
3+Evidence (de, 33560be9fd0f): Generative KI-Systeme dürfen grundsätzlich als Hilfsmittel bei unbeaufsichtigten schriftlichen Prüfungsleistungen wie Hausarbeiten, Seminararbeiten und Abschlussarbeiten eingesetzt werden, sofern ihr Einsatz nicht dem eigentlichen Zweck der Prüfung entgegensteht. Die Entscheidung darüber liegt im Ermessen der jeweiligen Prüfer oder Modulverantwortlichen.
4+privacy: University of Hohenheim guidance warns that third-party data may not be passed into AI systems without consent and says personal, confidential, or otherwise sensitive data generally must not be fed into AI systems.
5+Evidence (de, 33560be9fd0f): Unbedingt müssen Sie aber beachten: Daten von Dritten dürfen Sie ohne deren Zustimmung nicht weitergeben! Das gilt auch für die Eingabe in KI-Systeme, denn auf diese Daten können Beschäftigte des Anbieters Zugriff haben und sie können auch zum weiteren Training der Systeme benutzt werden.
6+academic_integrity: When generative AI tools are permitted for written work, University of Hohenheim materials say students submit an AI-use declaration in addition to the usual declaration of originality, with the exact contents determined by the examiner.
7+Evidence (de, 33560be9fd0f): Studierende reichen mit ihren schriftlichen Arbeiten zusätzlich zur Eigenständigkeitserklärung eine Erklärung zur Verwendung generativer KI ein. Was genau in dieser Erklärung enthalten sein muss, bestimmen Prüferin oder Prüfer.
8+ai_tool_treatment: Hohenheim KIM describes GPTalk as a university-internal AI chat service for university members that provides browser-based access to modern language models, including OpenAI ChatGPT and open-source models, without requiring an external account.
9+Evidence (de, 33579f9f83e8): GPTalk bietet allen Universitätsangehörigen einen niederschwelligen, datenschutzgerechten Zugang zu modernen Sprachmodellen wie ChatGPT von OpenAI sowie zu leistungsfähigen Open-Source-KIs – bequem im Browser, ohne externes Konto und ohne Weitergabe personenbezogener Daten.
10+security_review: The GPTalk guide tells students not to use GPTalk as their sole source, to enter no personal data, to remain responsible for the content as authors, and to make AI use transparent; it also says lecturers may not use GPTalk to correct or assess student work.
11+Evidence (de, ad9482a0e1bf): Für Studierende: Nutzen Sie GPTalk zur Unterstützung Ihres Lernprozesses, aber nicht als ausschließliche Quelle. Geben Sie keine personenbezogenen Daten ein – auch nicht von anderen Personen. Sie tragen die Verantwortung für die Inhalte und gelten als Autor*in der Arbeit. Machen Sie den Einsatz von KI transparent.

Claim changes

5 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

University of Hohenheim guidance says generative AI systems are generally permitted as aids in unsupervised written exams such as term papers, seminar papers, and theses when their use does not conflict with the exam purpose; the examiner or module supervisor decides for the specific assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence2Languagesde

privacy

University of Hohenheim guidance warns that third-party data may not be passed into AI systems without consent and says personal, confidential, or otherwise sensitive data generally must not be fed into AI systems.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence2Languagesde

academic_integrity

When generative AI tools are permitted for written work, University of Hohenheim materials say students submit an AI-use declaration in addition to the usual declaration of originality, with the exact contents determined by the examiner.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence2Languagesde

ai_tool_treatment

Hohenheim KIM describes GPTalk as a university-internal AI chat service for university members that provides browser-based access to modern language models, including OpenAI ChatGPT and open-source models, without requiring an external account.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesde

security_review

The GPTalk guide tells students not to use GPTalk as their sole source, to enter no personal data, to remain responsible for the content as authors, and to make AI use transparent; it also says lecturers may not use GPTalk to correct or assess student work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence2Languagesde

Source snapshots

4 source attributions