Policy presence
University of Hohenheim has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Stuttgart, Germany
University of Hohenheim
University of Hohenheim has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 18, 2026.
University of Hohenheim AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of Hohenheim has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 18, 2026. Discovery context: University of Hohenheim is listed as QS 2026 rank 711-720.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Hohenheim as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 18, 2026 and last changed on May 18, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-hohenheim.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Hohenheim has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University of Hohenheim has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
University of Hohenheim has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
University of Hohenheim has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
University of Hohenheim has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of Hohenheim has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Named AI services
University of Hohenheim has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
University of Hohenheim has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Hohenheim guidance says generative AI systems are generally permitted as aids in unsupervised written exams such as term papers, seminar papers, and theses when their use does not conflict with the exam purpose; the examiner or module supervisor decides for the specific assessment.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: generative_ai_generally_permitted_for_unsupervised_written_exams_subject_to_examiner_or_module_supervisor_discretion
Original evidence
Evidence 1Generative KI-Systeme dürfen grundsätzlich als Hilfsmittel bei unbeaufsichtigten schriftlichen Prüfungsleistungen wie Hausarbeiten, Seminararbeiten und Abschlussarbeiten eingesetzt werden, sofern ihr Einsatz nicht dem eigentlichen Zweck der Prüfung entgegensteht. Die Entscheidung darüber liegt im Ermessen der jeweiligen Prüfer oder Modulverantwortlichen.
Localized display only
Generative AI systems may generally be used as aids in unsupervised written examinations if their use does not conflict with the examination purpose; the examiner or module supervisor decides.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Generative KI-Systeme sind als Hilfsmittel grundsätzlich zulässig. Deren Nutzung ist an den erstellten Produkten aber nicht nachweisbar und birgt potentiell die Möglichkeit zur Täuschung in unbeaufsichtigten schriftlichen Studien- und Prüfungsleistungen.
Localized display only
The Senate recommendations state that generative AI systems are generally permissible as aids, while noting integrity risks in unsupervised written study and exam work.
Privacy
University of Hohenheim guidance warns that third-party data may not be passed into AI systems without consent and says personal, confidential, or otherwise sensitive data generally must not be fed into AI systems.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_enter_third_party_personal_confidential_or_sensitive_data_into_ai_systems
Original evidence
Evidence 1Unbedingt müssen Sie aber beachten: Daten von Dritten dürfen Sie ohne deren Zustimmung nicht weitergeben! Das gilt auch für die Eingabe in KI-Systeme, denn auf diese Daten können Beschäftigte des Anbieters Zugriff haben und sie können auch zum weiteren Training der Systeme benutzt werden.
Localized display only
Third-party data may not be passed on without consent, including by entering it into AI systems; provider employees may access it and it may be used for training.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Studierende dürfen keine Texte oder Daten, für die sie keine Urheberrechte oder das explizite Nutzungsrecht für diesen Verwendungszweck haben, Dritten zur Verfügung stellen. Dies schließt ein Einspeisen von Texten oder Daten in generative KI-Systeme ein.
Localized display only
Students may not make texts or data available to third parties without the required copyright or explicit usage rights; this includes feeding texts or data into generative AI systems.
Academic Integrity
When generative AI tools are permitted for written work, University of Hohenheim materials say students submit an AI-use declaration in addition to the usual declaration of originality, with the exact contents determined by the examiner.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_use_declaration_in_addition_to_originality_declaration_when_ai_permitted
Original evidence
Evidence 1Studierende reichen mit ihren schriftlichen Arbeiten zusätzlich zur Eigenständigkeitserklärung eine Erklärung zur Verwendung generativer KI ein. Was genau in dieser Erklärung enthalten sein muss, bestimmen Prüferin oder Prüfer.
Localized display only
Students submit an AI-use declaration with written work in addition to the declaration of originality; the examiner determines its required content.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Wenn Hilfsmittel wie generative KI-Systeme benutzt werden dürfen, ist neben einer Eigenständigkeitserklärung eine Übersicht über die benutzten KI-Systeme und deren Verwendung als Anlage zur schriftlichen Arbeit beizufügen.
Localized display only
If tools such as generative AI systems may be used, an overview of the AI systems used and how they were used must be attached to the written work alongside the originality declaration.
Ai Tool Treatment
Hohenheim KIM describes GPTalk as a university-internal AI chat service for university members that provides browser-based access to modern language models, including OpenAI ChatGPT and open-source models, without requiring an external account.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: gptalk_university_internal_ai_chat_service_for_university_members
Original evidence
Evidence 1GPTalk bietet allen Universitätsangehörigen einen niederschwelligen, datenschutzgerechten Zugang zu modernen Sprachmodellen wie ChatGPT von OpenAI sowie zu leistungsfähigen Open-Source-KIs – bequem im Browser, ohne externes Konto und ohne Weitergabe personenbezogener Daten.
Localized display only
GPTalk gives university members browser-based, privacy-conscious access to modern language models including OpenAI ChatGPT and open-source AI, without an external account or sharing personal data.
Security Review
The GPTalk guide tells students not to use GPTalk as their sole source, to enter no personal data, to remain responsible for the content as authors, and to make AI use transparent; it also says lecturers may not use GPTalk to correct or assess student work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: gptalk_rules_student_responsibility_transparency_no_personal_data_no_grading
Original evidence
Evidence 1Für Studierende: Nutzen Sie GPTalk zur Unterstützung Ihres Lernprozesses, aber nicht als ausschließliche Quelle. Geben Sie keine personenbezogenen Daten ein – auch nicht von anderen Personen. Sie tragen die Verantwortung für die Inhalte und gelten als Autor*in der Arbeit. Machen Sie den Einsatz von KI transparent.
Localized display only
For students, GPTalk should support learning but not serve as the sole source; students should enter no personal data, remain responsible as authors, and make AI use transparent.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Für Lehrende: GPTalk darf nicht zur Korrektur oder Bewertung studentischer Arbeiten verwendet werden. Auch bei anonymisierten Arbeiten ist zu beachten, dass der Einsatz generativer KI in Bewertungsprozessen gemäß EU-KI-Verordnung als Hochrisikoanwendung gelten kann.
Localized display only
For lecturers, GPTalk may not be used to correct or assess student work; even with anonymized work, generative AI in assessment processes can be high-risk under the EU AI Act.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
Einsatz von generativer KI in Prüfungen
uni-hohenheim.de
Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit generativen KI-Systemen im Zusammenhang mit akademischen Prüfungen
uni-hohenheim.de
GPTalk
kim.uni-hohenheim.de
Leitfaden zum Umgang mit GPTalk
kim.uni-hohenheim.de
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.