academic_integrity
FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.
審閱: 代理已審閱
變更紀錄
Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
變更摘要
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
6 條當前主張；1 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異，適用於 Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見，亦非學術誠信建議；除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁，否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目，不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變，本身並不等同於政策變動。
差異類別
此次版本差異的語意分類。
已記錄的文本比對
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
發布歷程
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
當前 Claim 記錄
現行主張紀錄：6。
academic_integrity
FITB guidance states that, by default, using AI during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and can be sanctioned unless the instructor allows or recommends AI use for a particular part of a course.
審閱: 代理已審閱
privacy
FITB guidance says students are prohibited from entering personal, sensitive, and confidential data into GenAI and are prohibited from using deepfakes for disinformation or manipulation.
審閱: 代理已審閱
academic_integrity
FITB guidance says students may not submit final academic work entirely generated by AI without original contribution.
審閱: 代理已審閱
ai_tool_treatment
FITB guidance says AI may be used as an aid in the learning process, while understanding, argumentation, analysis, and academic decisions remain human responsibilities.
審閱: 代理已審閱
teaching
FITB guidance says instructors need to set AI-use policies for their courses and communicate them at the start of the course; when AI use is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.
審閱: 代理已審閱
來源快照
官方來源紀錄：1。
Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) untuk kegiatan Akademik di FITB
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 16, 2026, 2:36 AM