Wijzigingslogboek

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Samenvatting wijzigingen

Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: 16 mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB). Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.

Er zijn nog geen beleidverschillen tussen releases geregistreerd voor deze universiteit. De pagina houdt nog steeds bij welke bronnen onderbouwing bieden, officiële bronaanwijzingen, de beoordelingsstatus, de actualiteit van bronnen en openbare JSON voor ontdekking en citatie.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.

Diff-categorieën

Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd0Bewijs0Bronsnapshots0Bron tekst0Bron toegevoegd0Bron verwijderd0

Gecombineerd releasediff

Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) combined release verschil

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.
3+Evidence (id, 5ad08928fe75): Deklarasi penggunaan AI adalah wajib, bukan opsional. Salah satu poin paling operasional dalam pedomen ITB adalah kewajiban deklarasi penggunaan AI untuk luaran perkuliahan ... Menggunakan AI tetapi tidak mendeklarasikan pemakaiannya, dapat dianggap pelanggaran serius, dengan konsekuensi akademik.
4+academic_integrity: FITB guidance states that, by default, using AI during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and can be sanctioned unless the instructor allows or recommends AI use for a particular part of a course.
5+Evidence (id, 5ad08928fe75): AI digunakan saat ujian, kuis, ataupun bentuk evaluasi lainnya: Secara default, menggunakan AI saat evaluasi adalah kecurangan akademik dan dapat dikenai sanksi. Pengecualian: Jika dosen mengizinkan atau menyarankan.
6+privacy: FITB guidance says students are prohibited from entering personal, sensitive, and confidential data into GenAI and are prohibited from using deepfakes for disinformation or manipulation.
7+Evidence (id, 5ad08928fe75): Data sensitif, privasi, dan deepfake: Mahasiswa dilarang memasukan data pribadi, sensitive, dan rahasia ke dalam GenAI. Mahasiswa juga dilarang menggunakan deepfake untuk disinformasi atau manipulasi.
8+academic_integrity: FITB guidance says students may not submit final academic work entirely generated by AI without original contribution.
9+Evidence (id, 5ad08928fe75): Menyerahkan hasil akhir full dari AI: Mahasiswa tidak boleh menyerahkan karya sepenuhnya dari hasil AI sebagai tugas akademik tanpa kontribusi original.
10+ai_tool_treatment: FITB guidance says AI may be used as an aid in the learning process, while understanding, argumentation, analysis, and academic decisions remain human responsibilities.
11+Evidence (id, 5ad08928fe75): AI boleh dipakai untuk proses belajar. Namun, pemahaman, argumentasi, analisa, dan keputusan-keputusan akademik tetap tanggung jawab manusia.
12+teaching: FITB guidance says instructors need to set AI-use policies for their courses and communicate them at the start of the course; when AI use is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.
13+Evidence (id, 5ad08928fe75): Kebijakan ITB memberi ruang bahwa setiap mata kuliah dapat memiliki aturan yang berbeda, namun dosen perlu menetapkan kebijakan penggunaan AI untuk mata kuliahnya dan mengkomunikasikan sejak awal perkuliahan. Bila penggunaan AI diizinkan, maka perlu ditekankan bahwa izin harus jelas dan eksplisit dari dosen, disertai batasan dan transparansi.

Geschiedenis releases

0 public release diffs

Aanpassingen claimen

6 Claimen registers

academic_integrity

FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%Bewijs1Talenid

academic_integrity

FITB guidance states that, by default, using AI during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and can be sanctioned unless the instructor allows or recommends AI use for a particular part of a course.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen89%Bewijs1Talenid

privacy

FITB guidance says students are prohibited from entering personal, sensitive, and confidential data into GenAI and are prohibited from using deepfakes for disinformation or manipulation.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen89%Bewijs1Talenid

academic_integrity

FITB guidance says students may not submit final academic work entirely generated by AI without original contribution.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen88%Bewijs1Talenid

ai_tool_treatment

FITB guidance says AI may be used as an aid in the learning process, while understanding, argumentation, analysis, and academic decisions remain human responsibilities.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen87%Bewijs1Talenid

teaching

FITB guidance says instructors need to set AI-use policies for their courses and communicate them at the start of the course; when AI use is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen87%Bewijs1Talenid

Bronsnapshots

1 bronattributie