academic_integrity
FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
6 claim records
academic_integrity
FITB guidance states that, by default, using AI during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and can be sanctioned unless the instructor allows or recommends AI use for a particular part of a course.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
FITB guidance says students are prohibited from entering personal, sensitive, and confidential data into GenAI and are prohibited from using deepfakes for disinformation or manipulation.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
FITB guidance says students may not submit final academic work entirely generated by AI without original contribution.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
FITB guidance says AI may be used as an aid in the learning process, while understanding, argumentation, analysis, and academic decisions remain human responsibilities.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
FITB guidance says instructors need to set AI-use policies for their courses and communicate them at the start of the course; when AI use is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
1 source attribution
Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) untuk kegiatan Akademik di FITB
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 2:36 AM