變更紀錄

Brno University of Technology

追蹤器歷史:0 筆發布紀錄。

變更摘要

目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。

9 條當前主張;4 個官方來源。

此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異,適用於 Brno University of Technology。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。

此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。

本追蹤器並非法律意見,亦非學術誠信建議;除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁,否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。

新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目,不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變,本身並不等同於政策變動。

差異類別

此次版本差異的語意分類。

追蹤器主張文字0新擷取0證據0來源快照0原文0已新增來源0來源已移除0

已記錄的文本比對

僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。

此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。

發布歷程

追蹤器歷史:0 筆發布紀錄。

當前 Claim 記錄

現行主張紀錄:9。

source_status

Brno University of Technology publishes official Czech-language guidance on generative AI use, including a central statement and recommendations for education, creative activity, and operational-administrative contexts.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準95%證據1語言cs

academic_integrity

VUT requires users to properly state when a result was achieved using generative AI, including the extent of use, and warns that incorrect or undisclosed use may be treated as an ethical violation such as ghost-writing or contract-cheating.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準95%證據1語言cs

academic_integrity

For education, VUT says copying generative-AI outputs and submitting them as student work is not permitted and will be treated similarly to contract-cheating, while assistant use for information search is permitted when the student independently assesses and uses the information.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準95%證據1語言cs

ai_tool_treatment

VUT frames generative AI as an assistant and consultation tool and supports open use within that role, subject to university principles and recommendations.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準94%證據1語言cs

academic_integrity

VUT's education recommendations say student work and final theses must state whether generative AI tools were used, and if so, to what extent and for what purpose.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準94%證據1語言cs

privacy

VUT warns users to ensure they are authorized to share data with generative-AI tools and to pay special attention to personal and other sensitive data.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準93%證據1語言cs

teaching

VUT says teachers may use generative AI tools to prepare teaching materials, but must state which tools were used and the extent of use.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準92%證據1語言cs

research

For creative activity, VUT supports generative-AI use by academic and research staff, but says employees must state which tools were used and the extent of use when creating scientific or artistic outputs.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準92%證據1語言cs

ai_tool_treatment

For operational-administrative work, VUT supports employee use of generative AI and says employees may use it to perform work duties, while stating which tools were used and the extent of use.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準90%證據1語言cs

來源快照

官方來源紀錄:4。

Doporučení pro oblast tvůrčí činnosti – VUT

official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 17, 2026, 1:54 AM

快照雜湊值
eb303c48afc588c6e0d0092bd2cd5db675a1da5d8924f4ac398a85455164c369

Doporučení pro oblast vzdělávání – VUT

official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 17, 2026, 1:51 AM

快照雜湊值
007dfc3ea9de65836a5a95d679982e1afa58ea74d5b6770421963a2baad798ae

Umělá inteligence a stanovisko k využívání nástrojů A.I. – VUT

official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 17, 2026, 1:49 AM

快照雜湊值
03d7d24376d41fd5690930b78c606b6d00f0a786cab746da6f811504a1c254b2