Ændringslog
Tracker-historik: 0 udgivelsesposter.
Aktualitet og gennemgangsstatus for den nuværende offentlige registrering.
9 aktuelle påstande; 4 officielle kilder.
Denne side kombinerer alle offentlige udgivelsesforskelle for Brno University of Technology. Individuelle udgivelsesøjebliksbilleder forbliver tilgængelige fra deres udgivelsesspecifikke URL'er.
Der er ingen registrerede opdateringer i denne sporers historik.
Denne tracker er ikke juridisk rådgivning, ikke rådgivning om akademisk integritet og ikke en officiel udtalelse fra universitetet, medmindre en tilknyttet kilde er universitetets egen officielle side.
Nyligt udtrukne påstande er tilføjelser til trackeren og er ikke nødvendigvis nyligt offentliggjort af universitetet. Ændringer i kildesnapshots viser hashændringer for samme kilde-URL og er i sig selv ikke politikændringer.
Semantisk klassificering af ændringerne i denne udgivelse.
Kun registrerede sammenligninger med et nøjagtigt Claim ID-match vises.
Der er ingen registrerede opdateringer i denne sporers historik.
Tracker-historik: 0 udgivelsesposter.
Aktuelle påstandsposter: 9.
Brno University of Technology publishes official Czech-language guidance on generative AI use, including a central statement and recommendations for education, creative activity, and operational-administrative contexts.
VUT requires users to properly state when a result was achieved using generative AI, including the extent of use, and warns that incorrect or undisclosed use may be treated as an ethical violation such as ghost-writing or contract-cheating.
For education, VUT says copying generative-AI outputs and submitting them as student work is not permitted and will be treated similarly to contract-cheating, while assistant use for information search is permitted when the student independently assesses and uses the information.
VUT frames generative AI as an assistant and consultation tool and supports open use within that role, subject to university principles and recommendations.
VUT's education recommendations say student work and final theses must state whether generative AI tools were used, and if so, to what extent and for what purpose.
VUT warns users to ensure they are authorized to share data with generative-AI tools and to pay special attention to personal and other sensitive data.
VUT says teachers may use generative AI tools to prepare teaching materials, but must state which tools were used and the extent of use.
For creative activity, VUT supports generative-AI use by academic and research staff, but says employees must state which tools were used and the extent of use when creating scientific or artistic outputs.
For operational-administrative work, VUT supports employee use of generative AI and says employees may use it to perform work duties, while stating which tools were used and the extent of use.
Officielle kildeoptegnelser: 4.
official_guidance Tracker kontrolleret den May 17, 2026, 1:55 AM
official_guidance Tracker kontrolleret den May 17, 2026, 1:54 AM
official_guidance Tracker kontrolleret den May 17, 2026, 1:51 AM
official_guidance Tracker kontrolleret den May 17, 2026, 1:49 AM
