Wijzigingslogboek
Trackergeschiedenis: 0 publicaties.
Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.
9 huidige claims; 4 officiële bronnen.
Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor Brno University of Technology. Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.
Deze trackergeschiedenis bevat geen vastgelegde updates.
Deze tracker geeft geen juridisch advies of advies over academische integriteit en is geen officiële universiteitsverklaring, tenzij de gelinkte bron de officiële universiteitspagina is.
Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.
Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.
Alleen vastgelegde vergelijkingen met exact hetzelfde claim-ID worden getoond.
Deze trackergeschiedenis bevat geen vastgelegde updates.
Trackergeschiedenis: 0 publicaties.
Huidige claimrecords: 9.
Brno University of Technology publishes official Czech-language guidance on generative AI use, including a central statement and recommendations for education, creative activity, and operational-administrative contexts.
VUT requires users to properly state when a result was achieved using generative AI, including the extent of use, and warns that incorrect or undisclosed use may be treated as an ethical violation such as ghost-writing or contract-cheating.
For education, VUT says copying generative-AI outputs and submitting them as student work is not permitted and will be treated similarly to contract-cheating, while assistant use for information search is permitted when the student independently assesses and uses the information.
VUT frames generative AI as an assistant and consultation tool and supports open use within that role, subject to university principles and recommendations.
VUT's education recommendations say student work and final theses must state whether generative AI tools were used, and if so, to what extent and for what purpose.
VUT warns users to ensure they are authorized to share data with generative-AI tools and to pay special attention to personal and other sensitive data.
VUT says teachers may use generative AI tools to prepare teaching materials, but must state which tools were used and the extent of use.
For creative activity, VUT supports generative-AI use by academic and research staff, but says employees must state which tools were used and the extent of use when creating scientific or artistic outputs.
For operational-administrative work, VUT supports employee use of generative AI and says employees may use it to perform work duties, while stating which tools were used and the extent of use.
Officiële bronrecords: 4.
official_guidance Door de tracker gecontroleerd op 17 mei 2026, 01:55
official_guidance Door de tracker gecontroleerd op 17 mei 2026, 01:54
official_guidance Door de tracker gecontroleerd op 17 mei 2026, 01:51
official_guidance Door de tracker gecontroleerd op 17 mei 2026, 01:49
