Endringslogg
Sporingshistorikk: 0 publiseringsoppføringer.
Oppdatering og gjennomgangsstatus for gjeldende offentlige registeroppføringer.
9 gjeldende påstander; 4 offisielle kilder.
Denne siden samler alle offentlige publiseringsforskjeller (diffs) for Brno University of Technology. Individuelle utgivelsesøyeblikksbilder forblir tilgjengelige fra sine utgivelsesspesifikke nettadresser.
Ingen registrerte oppdateringer er tilgjengelige i denne sporingshistorikken.
Denne oversikten er ikke juridisk rådgivning og ikke veiledning om akademisk integritet. Den er heller ikke en offisiell uttalelse fra universitetet, med mindre en lenket kilde er universitetets egen offisielle side.
Nyuttrukne påstander er tillegg i sporeren og er ikke nødvendigvis nylig publisert av universitetet. Endringer i kildeøyeblikksbilder viser hash-endringer for samme kilde-URL og er i seg selv ikke policyendringer.
Semantisk klassifisering av endringene i denne utgivelsen.
Bare registrerte sammenligninger med et nøyaktig Claim ID-samsvar vises.
Ingen registrerte oppdateringer er tilgjengelige i denne sporingshistorikken.
Sporingshistorikk: 0 publiseringsoppføringer.
Gjeldende påstandsposter: 9.
Brno University of Technology publishes official Czech-language guidance on generative AI use, including a central statement and recommendations for education, creative activity, and operational-administrative contexts.
VUT requires users to properly state when a result was achieved using generative AI, including the extent of use, and warns that incorrect or undisclosed use may be treated as an ethical violation such as ghost-writing or contract-cheating.
For education, VUT says copying generative-AI outputs and submitting them as student work is not permitted and will be treated similarly to contract-cheating, while assistant use for information search is permitted when the student independently assesses and uses the information.
VUT frames generative AI as an assistant and consultation tool and supports open use within that role, subject to university principles and recommendations.
VUT's education recommendations say student work and final theses must state whether generative AI tools were used, and if so, to what extent and for what purpose.
VUT warns users to ensure they are authorized to share data with generative-AI tools and to pay special attention to personal and other sensitive data.
VUT says teachers may use generative AI tools to prepare teaching materials, but must state which tools were used and the extent of use.
For creative activity, VUT supports generative-AI use by academic and research staff, but says employees must state which tools were used and the extent of use when creating scientific or artistic outputs.
For operational-administrative work, VUT supports employee use of generative AI and says employees may use it to perform work duties, while stating which tools were used and the extent of use.
Offisielle kildeposter: 4.
official_guidance Sporingsverktøy kontrollert May 17, 2026, 1:55 AM
official_guidance Sporingsverktøy kontrollert May 17, 2026, 1:54 AM
official_guidance Sporingsverktøy kontrollert May 17, 2026, 1:51 AM
official_guidance Sporingsverktøy kontrollert May 17, 2026, 1:49 AM
