Brisbane City, Australia

The University of Queensland

The University of Queensland is listed as QS 2026 rank =42. The University of Queensland has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready overview

v1 public contract

The University of Queensland is listed as QS 2026 rank =42. The University of Queensland has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Reviewed claims5Candidate claims0Official sources5

Candidate claims are source-backed records pending review. They are not final policy conclusions and are not legal or academic integrity advice.

Reviewed claims

5 reviewed public claim

Teaching

UQ course profiles must clearly state if, when, and how AI (including Machine Translation) is allowed. Two options exist: Option 1 prohibits AI in in-person assessment; Option 2 permits AI use with mandatory referencing.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: two_option_ai_assessment_policy

Original evidence

Evidence 1
In semester 1, 2026 the options in course profiles for each assessment remain the same as semester 2, 2025, these are: Option 1: Cannot use AI. AI is prohibited through in-person assessment. Option 2: Can use AI. AI use must be referenced.

Academic Integrity

UQ has disabled the Turnitin AI writing indicator functionality for all assessments from Semester 2, 2025, citing that AI detection tools are flawed and unreliable.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: turnitin_ai_detection_disabled

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI detection tools, including Turnitin, are flawed and unreliable. They cannot definitively determine whether text, ideas, or structures were generated by AI. At UQ we had the Turnitin AI detection tool available for staff to use, this tool was disabled in mid 2025.

Academic Integrity

At UQ, the use of AI outputs without attribution, and contrary to any direction by teaching staff, is a form of plagiarism and constitutes academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: ai_without_attribution_is_misconduct

Original evidence

Evidence 1
At UQ, the use of AI outputs without attribution, and contrary to any direction by teaching staff, is a form of plagiarism and constitutes academic misconduct.

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot Chat is UQ's enterprise AI tool, available to UQ staff and students, and the UQ Library says it provides a higher level of data security and privacy than other AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: copilot_chat_enterprise_tool

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Microsoft Copilot Chat is UQ's enterprise AI tool, available to UQ staff and students. Because Copilot Chat is UQ's enterprise system, it provides a higher level of data security and privacy than other AI tools.

Teaching

UQ says students must acknowledge where they used AI in assessment, including direct quotes or paraphrases of AI-generated content and use of AI tools for summarising, brainstorming, planning, editing, or proofreading.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: mandatory_ai_acknowledgment

Original evidence

Evidence 1
You must acknowledge where you used AI in assessment, including where you have directly quoted or paraphrased AI-generated content or used tools to summarise readings, brainstorm ideas, plan your process, or for editing or proofreading purposes.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

5 source attribution

Back to universities