Policy presence
The University of Queensland has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Brisbane City, Australia
The University of Queensland has 8 source-backed AI policy claims from 6 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 8 reviewed claims. Last checked May 23, 2026.
v1 public contract
The University of Queensland has 8 source-backed AI policy claims from 6 official source attributions, including 8 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 23, 2026. Discovery context: The University of Queensland is listed as QS 2026 rank =42.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists The University of Queensland as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 23, 2026 and last changed on May 23, 2026. The record contains 8 source-backed claims, including 8 reviewed claims, from 6 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-queensland.json. The entity-level confidence is 97%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
The University of Queensland has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
The University of Queensland has 4 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
The University of Queensland has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
The University of Queensland has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
The University of Queensland has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
The University of Queensland has 4 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
The University of Queensland has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
The University of Queensland has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
The University of Queensland has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
The University of Queensland has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
8 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
Normalized value: two_option_ai_assessment_policy
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1In semester 1, 2026 the options in course profiles for each assessment remain the same as semester 2, 2025, these are: Option 1: Cannot use AI. AI is prohibited through in-person assessment. Option 2: Can use AI. AI use must be referenced.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: turnitin_ai_detection_disabled
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1AI detection tools, including Turnitin, are flawed and unreliable. They cannot definitively determine whether text, ideas, or structures were generated by AI. At UQ we had the Turnitin AI detection tool available for staff to use, this tool was disabled in mid 2025.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: ai_without_attribution_is_misconduct
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1At UQ, the use of AI outputs without attribution, and contrary to any direction by teaching staff, is a form of plagiarism and constitutes academic misconduct.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: copilot_chat_enterprise_tool
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1Microsoft Copilot Chat is UQ's enterprise AI tool, available to UQ staff and students. Because Copilot Chat is UQ's enterprise system, it provides a higher level of data security and privacy than other AI tools.
Teaching
Normalized value: mandatory_ai_acknowledgment
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1You must acknowledge where you used AI in assessment, including where you have directly quoted or paraphrased AI-generated content or used tools to summarise readings, brainstorm ideas, plan your process, or for editing or proofreading purposes.
Teaching
Normalized value: University of Queensland says course coordinators provide guidance in course profiles defining appropriate AI use for each assessment task.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1Your course coordinators have provided guidance in your course profiles defining the appropriate use of AI in each assessment task.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: University of Queensland says inappropriate or unacknowledged AI use in assessment may be considered misconduct.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1If you use AI in your assessment inappropriately or without suitable acknowledgment it may be considered misconduct.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: University of Queensland disabled Turnitin AI writing indicator functionality for all assessments from Semester 2, 2025.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1UQ has disabled the Turnitin AI writing indicator functionality for all assessments from Semester 2, 2025.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
6 source attribution
my.uq.edu.au
my.uq.edu.au
guides.library.uq.edu.au
guides.library.uq.edu.au
guides.library.uq.edu.au
itali.uq.edu.au
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.