Brisbane City, Australia

The University of Queensland

The University of Queensland has 8 source-backed AI policy claims from 6 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 8 reviewed claims. Last checked May 23, 2026.

The University of Queensland AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

The University of Queensland has 8 source-backed AI policy claims from 6 official source attributions, including 8 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 23, 2026. Discovery context: The University of Queensland is listed as QS 2026 rank =42.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists The University of Queensland as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 23, 2026 and last changed on May 23, 2026. The record contains 8 source-backed claims, including 8 reviewed claims, from 6 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-queensland.json. The entity-level confidence is 97%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage8 reviewedSource languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-queensland.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
  • Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims8Reviewed8Candidate0Official sources6

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence80%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

AI disclosure

The University of Queensland has 4 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence4Sources3

Coursework

The University of Queensland has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence5Sources4

Privacy and data entry

The University of Queensland has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

The University of Queensland has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

The University of Queensland has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

The University of Queensland has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence4Sources3

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

The University of Queensland has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

8 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Teaching

UQ course profiles must clearly state if, when, and how AI (including Machine Translation) is allowed. Two options exist: Option 1 prohibits AI in in-person assessment; Option 2 permits AI use with mandatory referencing.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: two_option_ai_assessment_policy

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
In semester 1, 2026 the options in course profiles for each assessment remain the same as semester 2, 2025, these are: Option 1: Cannot use AI. AI is prohibited through in-person assessment. Option 2: Can use AI. AI use must be referenced.

Academic Integrity

UQ has disabled the Turnitin AI writing indicator functionality for all assessments from Semester 2, 2025, citing that AI detection tools are flawed and unreliable.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: turnitin_ai_detection_disabled

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
AI detection tools, including Turnitin, are flawed and unreliable. They cannot definitively determine whether text, ideas, or structures were generated by AI. At UQ we had the Turnitin AI detection tool available for staff to use, this tool was disabled in mid 2025.

Academic Integrity

At UQ, the use of AI outputs without attribution, and contrary to any direction by teaching staff, is a form of plagiarism and constitutes academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: ai_without_attribution_is_misconduct

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
At UQ, the use of AI outputs without attribution, and contrary to any direction by teaching staff, is a form of plagiarism and constitutes academic misconduct.

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot Chat is UQ's enterprise AI tool, available to UQ staff and students, and the UQ Library says it provides a higher level of data security and privacy than other AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: copilot_chat_enterprise_tool

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
Microsoft Copilot Chat is UQ's enterprise AI tool, available to UQ staff and students. Because Copilot Chat is UQ's enterprise system, it provides a higher level of data security and privacy than other AI tools.

Teaching

UQ says students must acknowledge where they used AI in assessment, including direct quotes or paraphrases of AI-generated content and use of AI tools for summarising, brainstorming, planning, editing, or proofreading.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: mandatory_ai_acknowledgment

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
You must acknowledge where you used AI in assessment, including where you have directly quoted or paraphrased AI-generated content or used tools to summarise readings, brainstorm ideas, plan your process, or for editing or proofreading purposes.

Teaching

University of Queensland says course coordinators provide guidance in course profiles defining appropriate AI use for each assessment task.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: University of Queensland says course coordinators provide guidance in course profiles defining appropriate AI use for each assessment task.

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
Your course coordinators have provided guidance in your course profiles defining the appropriate use of AI in each assessment task.

Academic Integrity

University of Queensland says inappropriate or unacknowledged AI use in assessment may be considered misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: University of Queensland says inappropriate or unacknowledged AI use in assessment may be considered misconduct.

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
If you use AI in your assessment inappropriately or without suitable acknowledgment it may be considered misconduct.

Academic Integrity

University of Queensland disabled Turnitin AI writing indicator functionality for all assessments from Semester 2, 2025.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: University of Queensland disabled Turnitin AI writing indicator functionality for all assessments from Semester 2, 2025.

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
UQ has disabled the Turnitin AI writing indicator functionality for all assessments from Semester 2, 2025.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

6 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 23, 2026Last changedMay 23, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities