Policy presence
University of Göttingen has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Göttingen, Germany
University of Göttingen
University of Göttingen is listed as QS 2026 rank 243. University of Göttingen has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of Göttingen is listed as QS 2026 rank 243. University of Göttingen has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Göttingen as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-gottingen.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Göttingen has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University of Göttingen has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
University of Göttingen has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Göttingen has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Göttingen has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
University of Göttingen has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Named AI services
University of Göttingen has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Göttingen has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
For supervised examinations, University of Göttingen guidance says AI tools are not permitted unless explicitly allowed.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: supervised_exams_ai_not_permitted_unless_allowed
Original evidence
Evidence 1In Prüfungen unter Aufsicht (z. B. Klausuren und mündlichen Prüfungen) ist der Einsatz von KI-Werkzeugen nicht zulässig, außer er wird explizit erlaubt.
Localized display only
In supervised exams, AI tools are not permitted unless explicitly allowed.
Privacy
University of Göttingen AI ethics and law guidance tells users not to enter personal data into AI applications unless it has first been securely and completely anonymized, and says students may not be required by lecturers to use or register for such systems in courses.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: no_personal_data_without_anonymization_no_required_student_registration
Original evidence
Evidence 1Geben Sie keine personenbezogenen Daten ein, es sei denn, diese wurden vorher sicher und vollständig anonymisiert. ... Studierende dürfen im Rahmen von Lehrveranstaltungen von Lehrenden nicht zur Nutzung, insbesondere nicht zur Registrierung, verpflichtet werden.
Localized display only
Do not enter personal data unless securely and completely anonymized; students may not be required to use or register for systems in courses.
Academic Integrity
For unsupervised examinations, University of Göttingen guidance says AI models should generally be permissible aids, but use of AI tools must be transparent.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unsupervised_exams_ai_generally_permissible_transparency_required
Original evidence
Evidence 1KI-Modelle sollten in Prüfungen ohne Aufsicht grundsätzlich ein zulässiges Hilfsmittel sein ... Der Einsatz von KI-Werkzeugen muss transparent erfolgen.
Localized display only
In unsupervised exams, AI models should generally be permissible aids; AI-tool use must be transparent.
Teaching
University of Göttingen guidance says students need clarity about AI-use rules in courses, and that those rules should be discussed at the beginning of each semester in all courses.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: course_ai_rules_discussed_start_semester
Original evidence
Evidence 1Die Studierenden brauchen auf jeden Fall Klarheit, welche Regeln für die Verwendung von KI in den Veranstaltungen gelten. Dies muss in allen Veranstaltungen zu Beginn des Semesters mit den Teilnehmenden einer Veranstaltung besprochen werden.
Localized display only
Students need clarity on course AI-use rules; these should be discussed at the start of the semester.
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Göttingen guidance says AI models are tools to be used, while students and instructors need competence for intelligent use and transparent disclosure of LLM use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_tools_supported_with_transparency_and_competence
Original evidence
Evidence 1die Universität Göttingen versteht die KI-Modelle als Werkzeuge, die benutzt werden und für deren intelligente Nutzung Studierende und Lehrende Kompetenzen erwerben müssen. Voraussetzung dafür ist ein transparenter Umgang
Localized display only
The University of Göttingen understands AI models as tools that are used, requiring competencies and transparent handling.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
KI Ethik & Recht
uni-goettingen.de
Umgang mit KI-Modellen in Studium und Lehre
uni-goettingen.de
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.