academic_integrity
For supervised examinations, University of Göttingen guidance says AI tools are not permitted unless explicitly allowed.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Change log
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Göttingen currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
5 claim records
For supervised examinations, University of Göttingen guidance says AI tools are not permitted unless explicitly allowed.
University of Göttingen AI ethics and law guidance tells users not to enter personal data into AI applications unless it has first been securely and completely anonymized, and says students may not be required by lecturers to use or register for such systems in courses.
For unsupervised examinations, University of Göttingen guidance says AI models should generally be permissible aids, but use of AI tools must be transparent.
University of Göttingen guidance says students need clarity about AI-use rules in courses, and that those rules should be discussed at the beginning of each semester in all courses.
University of Göttingen guidance says AI models are tools to be used, while students and instructors need competence for intelligent use and transparent disclosure of LLM use.
2 source attributions
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026