Policy presence
University of Bergen has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Bergen, Norway
University of Bergen
University of Bergen is listed as QS 2026 rank =287. University of Bergen has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of Bergen is listed as QS 2026 rank =287. University of Bergen has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Bergen as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-bergen.json. The entity-level confidence is 91%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Bergen has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University of Bergen has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
University of Bergen has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
University of Bergen has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
University of Bergen has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of Bergen has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Named AI services
University of Bergen has 4 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
University of Bergen has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Bergen tells students to check the rules for their own subject because faculties and departments may have their own guidelines for AI-based tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_check_subject_rules_faculty_department_variation
Original evidence
Evidence 1Som student må du forsikre deg om hvilke regler som gjelder for ditt fag. Det enkelte fakultet og institutt kan ha egne retningslinjer for bruk av KI-baserte verktøy for de ulike fagene.
Localized display only
Students are told to check the rules for their own subject; faculties and departments may have their own AI-tool guidelines.
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Bergen recommends that students and staff use Microsoft Copilot or UiBchat because UiB says these options give the user and UiB control over submitted prompts.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: recommends_copilot_or_uibchat_over_chatgpt_for_prompt_control
Original evidence
Evidence 1UiB anbefaler at studenter og ansatte bruker Microsoft copilot eller UiBchat, for da har brukeren og UiB kontroll over data (prompts) som er innsendt til verktøyene. Av samme grunn fraråder vi bruk av ChatGPT.
Localized display only
UiB recommends Microsoft Copilot or UiBchat for students and staff, and discourages ChatGPT for the same data-control reason.
Privacy
University of Bergen says ChatGPT can only be used for green data and UiBchat can be used for green and yellow data.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: chatgpt_green_data_only_uibchat_green_yellow_data
Original evidence
Evidence 1ChatGPT kan bare brukes til grønne data. UiBchat kan brukes både til grønne og gule data.
Localized display only
ChatGPT is limited to green data; UiBchat may be used for green and yellow data.
Academic Integrity
University of Bergen states that software, including AI tools, should be referenced when it affects results, analyses, or findings presented in academic work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: cite_ai_tools_when_software_affects_academic_results_analyses_findings
Original evidence
Evidence 1Generelt skal det refererast til all programvare som blir brukt i akademisk arbeid når programvara verkar inn på resultat, analyser eller funn som blir presenterte. Digitale verktøy skil seg ikkje frå dette.
Localized display only
Software used in academic work should be referenced when it affects presented results, analyses, or findings; digital tools are not different.
Privacy
University of Bergen tells teachers they cannot require students to use services for which UiB does not have a data processing agreement.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: teachers_cannot_require_services_without_uib_data_processing_agreement
Original evidence
Evidence 1Som underviser må du være oppmerksom på at du ikke kan pålegge studenter å bruke tjenester som UiB ikke har en databehandleravtale med. Dette gjelder per nå f.eks. ChatGPT og andre AI-tjenester.
Localized display only
Teachers are told they cannot require students to use services for which UiB lacks a data processing agreement, currently including ChatGPT and other AI services.
Teaching
University of Bergen guidance says academic communities should assess how and to what extent generative AI can be used in their own courses and study programs, and clarify the premises for students.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: academic_communities_assess_course_ai_use_and_clarify_premises
Original evidence
Evidence 1Fagmiljøene må selv vurdere hvordan og i hvilken grad verktøyet kan benyttes i egne emner og studieprogram, og tydeliggjøre premissene for bruk overfor studentene.
Localized display only
Academic communities should assess how and to what extent AI can be used in their own courses and programs, and clarify the premises to students.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Reielegheit og fusk
www4.uib.no
Studenters bruk av kunstig intelligens
www4.uib.no
Verktøy basert på kunstig intelligens i utdanning - for ansatte
uib.no
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.