Policy presence
Norwegian University of Science And Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Trondheim, Norway
Norwegian University of Science And Technology
Norwegian University of Science And Technology is listed as QS 2026 rank 267. Norwegian University of Science And Technology has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Norwegian University of Science And Technology is listed as QS 2026 rank 267. Norwegian University of Science And Technology has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Norwegian University of Science And Technology as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/norwegian-university-of-science-and-technology.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Norwegian University of Science And Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
Norwegian University of Science And Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Privacy and data entry
Norwegian University of Science And Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
Approved tools
Norwegian University of Science And Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Norwegian University of Science And Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
Norwegian University of Science And Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
NTNU has a formal guideline for use of ICT tools with generative artificial intelligence that applies to employees, students, and all users of NTNU ICT infrastructure.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: formal_generative_ai_ict_guideline
Original evidence
Evidence 1Type dokument: Retningslinje ... Gjelder fra: 30.09.2025 ... Gjelder for a. alle ansatte ved NTNU b. alle studenter ved NTNU c. alle som har tilgang til og/eller bruker NTNUs IKT-infrastruktur.
Localized display only
Document type: guideline. Applies from 2025-09-30. Applies to all NTNU employees, students, and users of NTNU ICT infrastructure.
Privacy
GPT NTNU guidance permits use with open and internal data, but says GPT NTNU must not be used to assess, process, or analyze information about people.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: open_internal_data_only_no_person_assessment
Original evidence
Evidence 1Du kan bruke verktøyet til å behandle informasjon og data som klassifiseres som åpne (grønne) og interne (gule) ... GPT NTNU skal ikke brukes til å vurdere, saksbehandle eller analysere informasjon om personer.
Localized display only
GPT NTNU can process open and internal data; it must not be used to assess, case-handle, or analyze information about people.
Ai Tool Treatment
NTNU's staff AI guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot and GPT NTNU as AI chat tools available to NTNU students and employees.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: copilot_and_gpt_ntnu_available
Original evidence
Evidence 1KI-verktøy godkjent på NTNU ... Microsoft Copilot er tilgjengelig for studenter og ansatte ved NTNU ... GPT NTNU er tilgjengelig for studenter og ansatte ved NTNU.
Localized display only
Approved AI tools at NTNU include Microsoft Copilot and GPT NTNU, each described as available to students and employees.
Teaching
NTNU provides an official teaching and assessment AI guidance page for instructors, with links to resources on talking with students about AI and exams with AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: teaching_assessment_ai_guidance_index
Original evidence
Evidence 1Her finn du grunnleggande informasjon om kva kunstig intelligens (KI) er, og korleis du kan forhalde deg til KI i gjennomføring av emnet ditt. Relaterte nettsider for deg som undervisar: Snakk med studentane om kunstig intelligens; Eksamen og kunstig intelligens.
Localized display only
NTNU provides basic information on AI in course delivery and links instructor-facing pages on talking with students about AI and exams with AI.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
Bruk av IKT-verktøy med generativ kunstig intelligens ved NTNU - retningslinje
i.ntnu.no
GPT NTNU
i.ntnu.no
Hvordan bruke kunstig intelligens som ansatt
i.ntnu.no
Kunstig intelligens i undervisning og vurdering
i.ntnu.no
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.