Policy presence
Norwegian University of Life Sciences has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Ås, Norway
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
Norwegian University of Life Sciences has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Norwegian University of Life Sciences has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Norwegian University of Life Sciences has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Norwegian University of Life Sciences has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Norwegian University of Life Sciences has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Norwegian University of Life Sciences has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Norwegian University of Life Sciences has 5 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
NMBU's generative AI guidelines require students to clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used, and to account for AI use in assignments or other work submitted for assessment or compulsory activity.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_use_disclosure_required_for_assessed_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1The student must follow academic norms of honesty, diligence, and openness, and clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used. If the student uses AI-based programs in a submitted assignment or in other work to be submitted for assessment or as a compulsory activity in a course, the student must account for the use.
Ai Tool Treatment
NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs are permitted in accordance with the guidelines, while individual course descriptions may state that AI-based programs are not permitted for exams or other assessed work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_permitted_by_guidelines_with_course_level_limits
Original evidence
Evidence 1At NMBU, the use of AI-based programs is permitted in accordance with these guidelines. In the online course description for each individual course, it may be stated that AI-based programs are not permitted for use in exams or in other work submitted for assessment in the course.
Ai Tool Treatment
NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs will normally not be permitted in written examinations on campus; for take-home exams, students must follow the AI-use specifications in the exam paper and course description.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: campus_written_exams_ai_normally_not_permitted
Original evidence
Evidence 1In written examinations on campus, the use of AI-based programs will normally not be permitted. In take-home exams, of shorter or longer duration, the student must comply with specifications regarding the use of AI given in the individual exam paper and in the course description.
Ai Tool Treatment
NMBU student guidance says each course description should state permitted AI use for assessment and compulsory activities, using three categories: K1 no AI use, K2 specified AI use, and K3 full AI use aligned with NMBU AI guidelines.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: course_descriptions_use_k1_k2_k3_ai_categories
Original evidence
Evidence 1I emnebeskrivelsen skal det stå informasjon om tillatt bruk av KI i emnet. Dette feltet skal inneholde en beskrivelse av hvordan KI er tillatt brukt ved de forskjellige vurderingsformene og de obligatoriske aktivitetene som emnet har. Det er 3 mulige kategorier av KI-bruk.
Localized display only
The course description should state permitted AI use for the course, including how AI is allowed for different assessment forms and compulsory activities; there are three possible AI-use categories.
Privacy
NMBU's Norwegian student guidance tells students not to use AI to process personal data or sensitive matters.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_should_not_process_personal_data_or_sensitive_matters_with_ai
Original evidence
Evidence 1Det er viktig å: bruke KI som støtte, ikke som erstatning for egen tenkning; kritisk vurdere kvaliteten på svarene du får; alltid oppgi bruk av KI i akademiske arbeider og merk tydelig materiale generert av språkmodeller; ikke bruke KI til å behandle personopplysninger eller sensitive saker.
Localized display only
The page says it is important to use AI as support rather than a substitute for one's own thinking, disclose AI use in academic work, and not use AI to process personal data or sensitive matters.
Academic Integrity
NMBU's Norwegian cheating and plagiarism page warns that incorrect or improper use of AI tools such as ChatGPT can create suspicion of attempted cheating and/or plagiarism, with possible consequences including annulment and exclusion.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: improper_ai_use_can_trigger_cheating_or_plagiarism_case
Original evidence
Evidence 1Husk at feil bruk av kunstig intelligens (KI)/artificial intelligence (AI) som eks. ChatGPT eller andre kan medføre mistanke om forsøk på fusk og/eller plagiering. Dette kan få alvorlige konsekvenser for deg.
Localized display only
The page warns that incorrect use of AI tools such as ChatGPT can lead to suspicion of attempted cheating and/or plagiarism, with serious consequences.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
4 source attribution
Fusk og plagiering ved NMBU
nmbu.no
Guidelines for Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) at NMBU
nmbu.no
Kunstig intelligens (KI), hjelpemidler, sitering og referering
nmbu.no
Permitted aids, AI, write and cite
nmbu.no