University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Liège, Belgium

Université de Liège

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%
Public JSONChange logMonthly reportCitation rulesDataset accessAnalysis JSONSubmit correction
Public JSONCitation rules
More tools

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources3Source languagefrPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universite-de-liege.json

Policy profile

Analysis JSONAnalysis review
Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

Université de Liège has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-uliege-ai-permitted-assistance

Teaching guidance

Université de Liège has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-uliege-ai-permitted-assistance

Research guidance

Université de Liège has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence70%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-uliege-copilot-license-source-status

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Tools directory
Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

The ULiège charter prohibits presenting AI-produced text, image, code, music, or similar output as one's own or as a fellow student's work, and says students who entrust all or part of personal work to ChatGPT or other AI may face sanctions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: prohibits_passing_ai_output_as_own_work

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Il est interdit de présenter la production d’une IA (texte, image, code, musique…) comme la sienne propre ou celle d’un condisciple [...] L’étudiant qui serait tenté de confier à ChatGPT ou d’autres IA le soin de produire, en tout ou en partie, ses travaux personnels est passible de sanctions.

Localized display only

The charter prohibits presenting AI output as one's own or another student's work and says using ChatGPT or other AI to produce all or part of personal work may lead to sanctions.

Source language
Francais (fr)
Snapshot hash
acecc9db2b1afd97841273730f0272344c078c8d5c966aa71a039378d2c2bcb6
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Usages proscrits

Source Status

ULiège has an official student charter setting a framework for generative AI use in academic contexts such as courses, assignments, exams, reports, and other learning activities.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: official_student_ai_charter

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
La présente charte, en fixant un cadre précis à l’utilisation de ces IA dans le contexte académique (cours, travaux, examens, rapports, et autres apprentissages) vous indique la frontière entre ce qui est permis ou souhaitable et ce qui ne l’est pas.

Localized display only

The charter sets a framework for AI use in academic contexts and distinguishes permitted or desirable use from what is not allowed.

Source language
Francais (fr)
Snapshot hash
acecc9db2b1afd97841273730f0272344c078c8d5c966aa71a039378d2c2bcb6
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Introductory section

Ai Tool Treatment

Subject to instructor instructions and prohibited uses, the ULiège charter allows AI use in student work without special mention when it acts as a language assistant or information-search assistant.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: permitted_language_and_information_assistance_when_not_contrary_to_instructions

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
En dehors d’instructions contraires de l’enseignant et des usages proscrits expliqués plus bas, vous pouvez, dans vos travaux, utiliser l’intelligence artificielle librement et sans mention particulière lorsqu’elle joue le rôle d’assistant linguistique [...] d’assistant à la recherche d’information.

Localized display only

Outside contrary instructor instructions and prohibited uses, AI may be used freely without special mention as a language assistant or information-search assistant.

Source language
Francais (fr)
Snapshot hash
acecc9db2b1afd97841273730f0272344c078c8d5c966aa71a039378d2c2bcb6
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Usages permis

Academic Integrity

The ULiège charter says students should be able to account transparently for their own contribution, and that work incorporating AI responses should reference the AI according to applicable bibliographic standards.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: ai_outputs_should_be_referenced_when_integrated

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Dans tout travail remis, l’enseignant doit être en mesure d’identifier la part qui vous revient. Vous devriez donc pouvoir en rendre compte en toute transparence. Si un travail intègre des réponses d’une IA (texte, image, code…), il faudra la référencer conformément aux normes bibliographiques en vigueur.

Localized display only

The charter says the instructor must be able to identify the student's contribution, and that AI responses incorporated into work must be referenced under applicable bibliographic standards.

Source language
Francais (fr)
Snapshot hash
acecc9db2b1afd97841273730f0272344c078c8d5c966aa71a039378d2c2bcb6
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Un usage transparent de l'IA

Source Status

An official ULiège publication reports that ULiège opted for a Copilot license accessible to students and staff, with data protection guaranteed when used with a ULiège Microsoft account.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: official_publication_reports_copilot_license_for_students_and_staff

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
L’ULiège a par ailleurs opté pour une licence de l’outil d’IA Copilot, accessible aux étudiants et membres du personnel, garantissant la protection des données moyennant son utilisation avec son compte Microsoft ULiège.

Localized display only

The official publication reports that ULiège chose a Copilot license for students and staff, with data protection when used through a ULiège Microsoft account.

Source language
Francais (fr)
Snapshot hash
0a8cea885a245c0380ab860347977f131870291a76c745b2417c17d37ddae502
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Éducation à l'IA

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Open contribution pathsReview workflow
Back to universities