Policy presence
Université de Liège has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Liège, Belgium
Université de Liège is listed as QS 2026 rank =379. Université de Liège has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
v1 public contract
Université de Liège is listed as QS 2026 rank =379. Université de Liège has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Université de Liège as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universite-de-liege.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
Université de Liège has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Université de Liège has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Université de Liège has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Université de Liège has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Université de Liège has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Université de Liège has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Université de Liège has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Université de Liège has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Université de Liège has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: prohibits_passing_ai_output_as_own_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1Il est interdit de présenter la production d’une IA (texte, image, code, musique…) comme la sienne propre ou celle d’un condisciple [...] L’étudiant qui serait tenté de confier à ChatGPT ou d’autres IA le soin de produire, en tout ou en partie, ses travaux personnels est passible de sanctions.
Localized display only
The charter prohibits presenting AI output as one's own or another student's work and says using ChatGPT or other AI to produce all or part of personal work may lead to sanctions.
Source Status
Normalized value: official_student_ai_charter
Original evidence
Evidence 1La présente charte, en fixant un cadre précis à l’utilisation de ces IA dans le contexte académique (cours, travaux, examens, rapports, et autres apprentissages) vous indique la frontière entre ce qui est permis ou souhaitable et ce qui ne l’est pas.
Localized display only
The charter sets a framework for AI use in academic contexts and distinguishes permitted or desirable use from what is not allowed.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: permitted_language_and_information_assistance_when_not_contrary_to_instructions
Original evidence
Evidence 1En dehors d’instructions contraires de l’enseignant et des usages proscrits expliqués plus bas, vous pouvez, dans vos travaux, utiliser l’intelligence artificielle librement et sans mention particulière lorsqu’elle joue le rôle d’assistant linguistique [...] d’assistant à la recherche d’information.
Localized display only
Outside contrary instructor instructions and prohibited uses, AI may be used freely without special mention as a language assistant or information-search assistant.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: ai_outputs_should_be_referenced_when_integrated
Original evidence
Evidence 1Dans tout travail remis, l’enseignant doit être en mesure d’identifier la part qui vous revient. Vous devriez donc pouvoir en rendre compte en toute transparence. Si un travail intègre des réponses d’une IA (texte, image, code…), il faudra la référencer conformément aux normes bibliographiques en vigueur.
Localized display only
The charter says the instructor must be able to identify the student's contribution, and that AI responses incorporated into work must be referenced under applicable bibliographic standards.
Source Status
Normalized value: official_publication_reports_copilot_license_for_students_and_staff
Original evidence
Evidence 1L’ULiège a par ailleurs opté pour une licence de l’outil d’IA Copilot, accessible aux étudiants et membres du personnel, garantissant la protection des données moyennant son utilisation avec son compte Microsoft ULiège.
Localized display only
The official publication reports that ULiège chose a Copilot license for students and staff, with data protection when used through a ULiège Microsoft account.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
3 source attribution
student.uliege.be
technopedagogie.uliege.be
lqj.uliege.be
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.