Liège, Belgium

Université de Liège

Université de Liège is listed as QS 2026 rank =379. Université de Liège has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

Université de Liège is listed as QS 2026 rank =379. Université de Liège has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Université de Liège as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universite-de-liege.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage5 reviewedSource languagefrPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universite-de-liege.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Source status claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources3

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

Université de Liège has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

Université de Liège has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

Université de Liège has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence70%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

The ULiège charter prohibits presenting AI-produced text, image, code, music, or similar output as one's own or as a fellow student's work, and says students who entrust all or part of personal work to ChatGPT or other AI may face sanctions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: prohibits_passing_ai_output_as_own_work

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Il est interdit de présenter la production d’une IA (texte, image, code, musique…) comme la sienne propre ou celle d’un condisciple [...] L’étudiant qui serait tenté de confier à ChatGPT ou d’autres IA le soin de produire, en tout ou en partie, ses travaux personnels est passible de sanctions.

Localized display only

The charter prohibits presenting AI output as one's own or another student's work and says using ChatGPT or other AI to produce all or part of personal work may lead to sanctions.

Source Status

ULiège has an official student charter setting a framework for generative AI use in academic contexts such as courses, assignments, exams, reports, and other learning activities.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: official_student_ai_charter

Original evidence

Evidence 1
La présente charte, en fixant un cadre précis à l’utilisation de ces IA dans le contexte académique (cours, travaux, examens, rapports, et autres apprentissages) vous indique la frontière entre ce qui est permis ou souhaitable et ce qui ne l’est pas.

Localized display only

The charter sets a framework for AI use in academic contexts and distinguishes permitted or desirable use from what is not allowed.

Ai Tool Treatment

Subject to instructor instructions and prohibited uses, the ULiège charter allows AI use in student work without special mention when it acts as a language assistant or information-search assistant.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: permitted_language_and_information_assistance_when_not_contrary_to_instructions

Original evidence

Evidence 1
En dehors d’instructions contraires de l’enseignant et des usages proscrits expliqués plus bas, vous pouvez, dans vos travaux, utiliser l’intelligence artificielle librement et sans mention particulière lorsqu’elle joue le rôle d’assistant linguistique [...] d’assistant à la recherche d’information.

Localized display only

Outside contrary instructor instructions and prohibited uses, AI may be used freely without special mention as a language assistant or information-search assistant.

Academic Integrity

The ULiège charter says students should be able to account transparently for their own contribution, and that work incorporating AI responses should reference the AI according to applicable bibliographic standards.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: ai_outputs_should_be_referenced_when_integrated

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Dans tout travail remis, l’enseignant doit être en mesure d’identifier la part qui vous revient. Vous devriez donc pouvoir en rendre compte en toute transparence. Si un travail intègre des réponses d’une IA (texte, image, code…), il faudra la référencer conformément aux normes bibliographiques en vigueur.

Localized display only

The charter says the instructor must be able to identify the student's contribution, and that AI responses incorporated into work must be referenced under applicable bibliographic standards.

Source Status

An official ULiège publication reports that ULiège opted for a Copilot license accessible to students and staff, with data protection guaranteed when used with a ULiège Microsoft account.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: official_publication_reports_copilot_license_for_students_and_staff

Original evidence

Evidence 1
L’ULiège a par ailleurs opté pour une licence de l’outil d’IA Copilot, accessible aux étudiants et membres du personnel, garantissant la protection des données moyennant son utilisation avec son compte Microsoft ULiège.

Localized display only

The official publication reports that ULiège chose a Copilot license for students and staff, with data protection when used through a ULiège Microsoft account.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities