Bangkok, Thailand

King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi

King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 22, 2026.

King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 22, 2026. Discovery context: King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi is listed as QS 2026 rank 901-950.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 22, 2026 and last changed on May 22, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/king-mongkut-s-university-of-technology-thonburi.json. The entity-level confidence is 92%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources1

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Policy presence

King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

AI disclosure

King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

When students, learners, or personnel use AI tools to create content, KMUTT requires them to cite and clearly state the scope of that use; concealing such use is treated as an ethical violation that may be penalized under relevant rules.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: ai_content_creation_use_requires_citation_and_scope_disclosure

Original evidence

Evidence 1
หากมีการใช้เครื่องมือปัญญาประดิษฐ์สำหรับการสร้างเนื้อหา นักศึกษา ผู้เรียนรู้ และบุคลากร ต้องอ้างอิงและระบุให้ชัดเจนถึงขอบเขตการใช้เครื่องมือนั้น การปกปิดไม่แจ้งข้อมูลการใช้เครื่องมือปัญญาประดิษฐ์สำหรับการสร้างเนื้อหา ถือว่าเป็นการละเมิดหลักจริยธรรม อาจถูกลงโทษตามข้อบังคับหรือระเบียบที่เกี่ยวข้องได้

Localized display only

Users must cite and clearly disclose the scope of AI-tool use; concealing AI-tool use for content creation is treated as an ethical violation.

Ai Tool Treatment

KMUTT has university-level principles and guidelines for using Artificial Intelligence Tools to create content for teaching, learning, and research.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: official_ai_tools_guidance_for_teaching_learning_research_content_creation

Original evidence

Evidence 1
เพื่อให้การใช้เครื่องมือปัญญาประดิษฐ์ในการสร้างเนื้อหาสำหรับการเรียนการสอนและการวิจัย เป็นไปด้วยความเรียบร้อยและมีประสิทธิภาพ มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีพระจอมเกล้าธนบุรี จึงกำหนดหลักการและแนวปฏิบัติในการใช้เครื่องมือปัญญาประดิษฐ์ (Artificial Intelligence Tools) สำหรับการสร้างเนื้อหาไว้ดังต่อไปนี้

Localized display only

KMUTT sets principles and guidelines for using Artificial Intelligence Tools to create content for teaching, learning, and research.

Teaching

KMUTT states that instructors or researchers must use discretion when defining the scope of AI-tool use for content creation in teaching, learning, or research, without affecting teaching objectives, learning outcomes, or research objectives.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: instructors_researchers_define_ai_use_scope_with_objective_and_outcome_constraints

Original evidence

Evidence 1
อาจารย์ผู้สอน หรือผู้วิจัย ต้องใช้ดุลยพินิจในการกำหนดขอบเขตการใช้เครื่องมือปัญญาประดิษฐ์สำหรับการสร้างเนื้อหาเพื่อการเรียนการสอนหรือการวิจัย ทั้งนี้ ต้องไม่กระทบต่อวัตถุประสงค์ของการเรียนการสอนและผลลัพธ์การเรียนรู้ รวมถึงวัตถุประสงค์ของการวิจัยด้วย

Localized display only

Instructors or researchers must use discretion in defining AI-tool-use scope and must not affect teaching objectives, learning outcomes, or research objectives.

Teaching

Where students and learners are permitted to use AI tools to create content, KMUTT says instructors should adjust learning-outcome assessment methods appropriately.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: permitted_student_ai_use_should_trigger_appropriate_assessment_adjustment

Original evidence

Evidence 1
ในกรณีที่มีการอนุญาตให้นักศึกษาและผู้เรียนรู้ใช้เครื่องมือปัญญาประดิษฐ์สำหรับการสร้างเนื้อหา อาจารย์ผู้สอนควรปรับวิธีการวัดประเมินผลลัพธ์การเรียนรู้ให้เหมาะสม

Localized display only

If students and learners are permitted to use AI tools for content creation, instructors should adjust learning-outcome assessment methods appropriately.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

1 source attribution

ประกาศมหาวิทยาลัย เรื่อง หลักการและแนวปฏิบัติในการใช้เครื่องมือปัญญาประดิษฐ์ (Artificial Intelligence Tools) สำหรับการสร้างเนื้อหา พ.ศ. 2567

kmutt.ac.th

Snapshot hash
ca51ca5c52b0a77de5059cdfe2919365e5401f52577d6850b4efe5385be5faf4

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 22, 2026Last changedMay 22, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities