Erlangen, Germany

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

7 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

HAWKI is listed for Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"HAWKI","description":"HAWKI is the FAU chatbot service, providing access to several language models for FAU users.","howToObtain":"Sign in with the FAU IDM account from the University network or through VPN.","costToUser":"Not specified by the cited source.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The provider is Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. The FAU chatbot HAWKI uses several language models including ChatGPT, LLaMA, Mistral and Teuken; sign in with the IDM account from the University network.

Localized display only

The provider is Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. The FAU chatbot HAWKI uses several language models including ChatGPT, LLaMA, Mistral and Teuken; sign in with the IDM account from the University network.

Academic Integrity

FAU's central exams page states that if AI is not expressly permitted in exams, especially written papers, it is an unauthorized aid and can lead to the exam being failed for deception.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: ai_unless_expressly_allowed_is_unauthorized_aid

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Sofern künstliche Intelligenz nicht ausdrücklich erlaubt ist, stellt sie ein unzulässiges Hilfsmittel. Dies wiederum hat zur Folge, dass die Prüfung wegen Täuschung als nicht bestanden gilt.

Localized display only

FAU says AI is an unauthorized aid unless expressly permitted, and the exam is failed for deception.

Source Status

FAU describes its AI-in-teaching guidelines as orientation and inspiration and states that they do not have Satzungscharakter; teaching and exam-related rules remain part of the individual study and examination regulations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: guidance_not_statute

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Die Leitlinien für KI in der Lehre an der FAU haben keinen Satzungscharakter. Lehr- und prüfungsbezogene Regelungen sind Teil der einzelnen Studien- und Prüfungsordnungen

Localized display only

FAU says the AI-in-teaching guidelines do not have statute character, and teaching/exam rules belong to individual study and examination regulations.

Academic Integrity

FAU guidance says instructors are responsible for clear AI-use rules in teaching activities, especially exams, and that students must disclose generative AI use according to the relevant course rules.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: course_rules_and_disclosure

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Lehrende sind verantwortlich für die klare Regelung des KI-Einsatzes in sämtlichen Lehraktivitäten, insbesondere in Prüfungen. Sie müssen für die Prüfungsszenarien in ihren Lehrveranstaltungen verbindliche Vorgaben festlegen

Localized display only

FAU says instructors are responsible for clear AI-use rules, especially in exams, and must set binding requirements for exam scenarios.

Privacy

FAU guidance tells users to choose AI tools with data-protection compliance and not to enter personal, confidential, copyright-protected, or personal data into AI systems.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: avoid_personal_confidential_data_in_ai

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Geben Sie keine personenbezogenen oder vertraulichen Informationen, insbesondere urheberrechtlich geschützte oder personenbezogene Daten, in KI-Systeme ein.

Localized display only

FAU says not to enter personal or confidential information, especially copyrighted or personal data, into AI systems.

Academic Integrity

FAU's AI-in-teaching guidance says examiners must individually determine and announce whether and how AI-supported aids may be used, and students must disclose the aids used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: examiner_sets_and_communicates_ai_rules

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Prüfende müssen für jede Prüfung individuell festlegen und bekannt geben, ob und in welcher Form (KI-gestützte) Hilfsmittel genutzt werden dürfen, und diese Vorgaben den Studierenden eindeutig kommunizieren. In jedem Fall sind die verwendeten Hilfsmittel von den Studierenden offenzulegen.

Localized display only

FAU says examiners must set and communicate AI-aid rules for each exam, and students must disclose the aids used.

Teaching

FAU frames generative AI as support for innovative teaching practices that can strengthen didactic value while preserving academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: responsible_ai_teaching_guidance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
KI ermöglicht neue Lehr- und Lernformate, die sowohl Lehrenden als auch Studierenden erweiterte Möglichkeiten eröffnen. Sie kann interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit und eine zukunftsorientierte, vernetzte Lehr- und Lernkultur unterstützen, die die akademische Integrität wahrt und den didaktischen Mehrwert stärkt.

Localized display only

FAU says AI can support a connected teaching and learning culture that preserves academic integrity and strengthens didactic value.

Source record

Official sources

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/friedrich-alexander-universitat-erlangen-nurnberg

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log