academic_integrity
FAU's central exams page states that if AI is not expressly permitted in exams, especially written papers, it is an unauthorized aid and can lead to the exam being failed for deception.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+12-0
11 # Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: FAU's central exams page states that if AI is not expressly permitted in exams, especially written papers, it is an unauthorized aid and can lead to the exam being failed for deception.
3+Evidence (de, b3d4f2ad8f35): Sofern künstliche Intelligenz nicht ausdrücklich erlaubt ist, stellt sie ein unzulässiges Hilfsmittel. Dies wiederum hat zur Folge, dass die Prüfung wegen Täuschung als nicht bestanden gilt.
4+source_status: FAU describes its AI-in-teaching guidelines as orientation and inspiration and states that they do not have Satzungscharakter; teaching and exam-related rules remain part of the individual study and examination regulations.
5+Evidence (de, 97c612e558d2): Die Leitlinien für KI in der Lehre an der FAU haben keinen Satzungscharakter. Lehr- und prüfungsbezogene Regelungen sind Teil der einzelnen Studien- und Prüfungsordnungen
6+academic_integrity: FAU guidance says instructors are responsible for clear AI-use rules in teaching activities, especially exams, and that students must disclose generative AI use according to the relevant course rules.
7+Evidence (de, 97c612e558d2): Lehrende sind verantwortlich für die klare Regelung des KI-Einsatzes in sämtlichen Lehraktivitäten, insbesondere in Prüfungen. Sie müssen für die Prüfungsszenarien in ihren Lehrveranstaltungen verbindliche Vorgaben festlegen
8+privacy: FAU guidance tells users to choose AI tools with data-protection compliance and not to enter personal, confidential, copyright-protected, or personal data into AI systems.
9+Evidence (de, 97c612e558d2): Geben Sie keine personenbezogenen oder vertraulichen Informationen, insbesondere urheberrechtlich geschützte oder personenbezogene Daten, in KI-Systeme ein.
10+academic_integrity: FAU's AI-in-teaching guidance says examiners must individually determine and announce whether and how AI-supported aids may be used, and students must disclose the aids used.
11+Evidence (de, 97c612e558d2): Prüfende müssen für jede Prüfung individuell festlegen und bekannt geben, ob und in welcher Form (KI-gestützte) Hilfsmittel genutzt werden dürfen, und diese Vorgaben den Studierenden eindeutig kommunizieren. In jedem Fall sind die verwendeten Hilfsmittel von den Studierenden offenzulegen.
12+teaching: FAU frames generative AI as support for innovative teaching practices that can strengthen didactic value while preserving academic integrity.
13+Evidence (de, 97c612e558d2): KI ermöglicht neue Lehr- und Lernformate, die sowohl Lehrenden als auch Studierenden erweiterte Möglichkeiten eröffnen. Sie kann interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit und eine zukunftsorientierte, vernetzte Lehr- und Lernkultur unterstützen, die die akademische Integrität wahrt und den didaktischen Mehrwert stärkt.
Claim changes
6 claim records
source_status
FAU describes its AI-in-teaching guidelines as orientation and inspiration and states that they do not have Satzungscharakter; teaching and exam-related rules remain part of the individual study and examination regulations.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
FAU guidance says instructors are responsible for clear AI-use rules in teaching activities, especially exams, and that students must disclose generative AI use according to the relevant course rules.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
FAU guidance tells users to choose AI tools with data-protection compliance and not to enter personal, confidential, copyright-protected, or personal data into AI systems.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
FAU's AI-in-teaching guidance says examiners must individually determine and announce whether and how AI-supported aids may be used, and students must disclose the aids used.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
FAU frames generative AI as support for innovative teaching practices that can strengthen didactic value while preserving academic integrity.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
3 source attributions
KI Leitlinien
official_guidance checked May 15, 2026
Leitlinien für Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) in der Lehre an der FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg
official_pdf checked May 15, 2026
Prüfungen und Prüfungsämter
official_guidance checked May 15, 2026