Change log

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: FAU's central exams page states that if AI is not expressly permitted in exams, especially written papers, it is an unauthorized aid and can lead to the exam being failed for deception.
3+Evidence (de, b3d4f2ad8f35): Sofern künstliche Intelligenz nicht ausdrücklich erlaubt ist, stellt sie ein unzulässiges Hilfsmittel. Dies wiederum hat zur Folge, dass die Prüfung wegen Täuschung als nicht bestanden gilt.
4+source_status: FAU describes its AI-in-teaching guidelines as orientation and inspiration and states that they do not have Satzungscharakter; teaching and exam-related rules remain part of the individual study and examination regulations.
5+Evidence (de, 97c612e558d2): Die Leitlinien für KI in der Lehre an der FAU haben keinen Satzungscharakter. Lehr- und prüfungsbezogene Regelungen sind Teil der einzelnen Studien- und Prüfungsordnungen
6+academic_integrity: FAU guidance says instructors are responsible for clear AI-use rules in teaching activities, especially exams, and that students must disclose generative AI use according to the relevant course rules.
7+Evidence (de, 97c612e558d2): Lehrende sind verantwortlich für die klare Regelung des KI-Einsatzes in sämtlichen Lehraktivitäten, insbesondere in Prüfungen. Sie müssen für die Prüfungsszenarien in ihren Lehrveranstaltungen verbindliche Vorgaben festlegen
8+privacy: FAU guidance tells users to choose AI tools with data-protection compliance and not to enter personal, confidential, copyright-protected, or personal data into AI systems.
9+Evidence (de, 97c612e558d2): Geben Sie keine personenbezogenen oder vertraulichen Informationen, insbesondere urheberrechtlich geschützte oder personenbezogene Daten, in KI-Systeme ein.
10+academic_integrity: FAU's AI-in-teaching guidance says examiners must individually determine and announce whether and how AI-supported aids may be used, and students must disclose the aids used.
11+Evidence (de, 97c612e558d2): Prüfende müssen für jede Prüfung individuell festlegen und bekannt geben, ob und in welcher Form (KI-gestützte) Hilfsmittel genutzt werden dürfen, und diese Vorgaben den Studierenden eindeutig kommunizieren. In jedem Fall sind die verwendeten Hilfsmittel von den Studierenden offenzulegen.
12+teaching: FAU frames generative AI as support for innovative teaching practices that can strengthen didactic value while preserving academic integrity.
13+Evidence (de, 97c612e558d2): KI ermöglicht neue Lehr- und Lernformate, die sowohl Lehrenden als auch Studierenden erweiterte Möglichkeiten eröffnen. Sie kann interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit und eine zukunftsorientierte, vernetzte Lehr- und Lernkultur unterstützen, die die akademische Integrität wahrt und den didaktischen Mehrwert stärkt.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

6 claim records

academic_integrity

FAU's central exams page states that if AI is not expressly permitted in exams, especially written papers, it is an unauthorized aid and can lead to the exam being failed for deception.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesde

source_status

FAU describes its AI-in-teaching guidelines as orientation and inspiration and states that they do not have Satzungscharakter; teaching and exam-related rules remain part of the individual study and examination regulations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

FAU guidance says instructors are responsible for clear AI-use rules in teaching activities, especially exams, and that students must disclose generative AI use according to the relevant course rules.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesde

privacy

FAU guidance tells users to choose AI tools with data-protection compliance and not to enter personal, confidential, copyright-protected, or personal data into AI systems.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

FAU's AI-in-teaching guidance says examiners must individually determine and announce whether and how AI-supported aids may be used, and students must disclose the aids used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesde

teaching

FAU frames generative AI as support for innovative teaching practices that can strengthen didactic value while preserving academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde

Source snapshots

3 source attributions