Policy presence
Brunel University of London has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
London, United Kingdom
Brunel University of London
Brunel University of London is listed as QS 2026 rank =385. Brunel University of London has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Brunel University of London is listed as QS 2026 rank =385. Brunel University of London has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Brunel University of London as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/brunel-university-of-london.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Brunel University of London has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Brunel University of London has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Brunel University of London has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Brunel University of London has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Brunel University of London has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
Brunel University of London has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Brunel University of London has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Brunel University of London has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Brunel University of London has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Brunel's student GenAI guidance advises students to avoid entering personal details, confidential records, identifiable information, or personal documents into generative AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Student guidance warns against sharing personal, sensitive, confidential, or identifiable information with GenAI tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1Avoid entering personal details, confidential records, or identifiable information into GenAI tools.
Localized display only
Student guidance warns against entering personal, confidential, or identifiable information into GenAI tools.
Academic Integrity
Brunel's published principles for generative AI in teaching and learning state that when generative AI is used in assessment, its use must be declared.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Assessment use of GenAI must be declared
Original evidence
Evidence 1Academic Integrity. We'll work to ensure academic integrity is maintained through appropriate guidance on acceptable and unacceptable use. When Generative AI is used in assessment, its use must be declared.
Localized display only
The principles state that assessment use of generative AI must be declared.
Teaching
Brunel's student-facing guidance says generative AI tools can support learning, but students remain responsible for their work and ideas and should use GenAI as a learning aid rather than a shortcut.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Student GenAI guidance emphasizes responsible learning support rather than replacement of student work
Original evidence
Evidence 1This document sets out clear expectations and practical advice for using GenAI tools as part of your academic journey at Brunel University of London. Its purpose is to support and advance your learning and personal development; while ensuring you remain responsible for your work and ideas.
Localized display only
Student GenAI guidance says students remain responsible for their work and ideas.
Ai Tool Treatment
Brunel's student guidance suggests using university-approved GenAI tools such as Copilot or BrunOwl AI Study Buddy, describing them as university-managed tools whose entered information is not used to train AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: University-approved GenAI tools include Copilot and BrunOwl AI Study Buddy
Original evidence
Evidence 1Use GenAI tools approved by the University, such as Copilot or BrunOwl AI Study Buddy. These are university-managed, and information entered is not used to train the AI.
Localized display only
The guidance suggests university-approved GenAI tools such as Copilot or BrunOwl AI Study Buddy.
Academic Integrity
Brunel University Library's generative AI guide states that use of generative AI tools in an assignment is not permitted unless the module leader has explicitly specified that their use is permitted.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Assignment use of GenAI is not permitted unless explicitly allowed by the module leader, according to the library guide's quotation of university guidance
Original evidence
Evidence 1the use of any type of generative artificial intelligence tools (such as text generating, image generating, computer software generating, and translators) is not permitted in your assignment unless your module leader has explicitly specified that their use is permitted
Localized display only
The library guide quotes official guidance saying assignment use is not permitted unless explicitly allowed by the module leader.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
AI at Brunel
students.brunel.ac.uk
Generative AI - Guidance for students: Overview
libguides.brunel.ac.uk
Principles of AI
brunel.ac.uk
Using artificial intelligence in your studies
students.brunel.ac.uk
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.