Krakow, Poland

AGH University of Krakow

AGH University of Krakow has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 3 reviewed claims. Last checked May 19, 2026.

AGH University of Krakow AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

AGH University of Krakow has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 3 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 19, 2026. Discovery context: AGH University of Krakow is listed as QS 2026 rank 801-850.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists AGH University of Krakow as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 19, 2026 and last changed on May 19, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/agh-university-of-krakow.json. The entity-level confidence is 91%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage3 reviewedSource languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/agh-university-of-krakow.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims3Reviewed3Candidate0Official sources2

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score70/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence76%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

AGH University of Krakow has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

AGH University of Krakow has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

AGH University Main Library describes ScienceDirect AI as a generative-AI tool integrated with ScienceDirect and presents it as a resource for searching and analysing scientific literature.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: library_sciencedirect_ai_resource

Original evidence

Evidence 1
ScienceDirect AI is a tool based on generative artificial intelligence, integrated with the ScienceDirect platform. ScienceDirect AI searches for information in the full texts of articles and book chapters available in the ScienceDirect database.

Localized display only

AGH University Main Library describes ScienceDirect AI as a generative-AI tool integrated with ScienceDirect for searching full texts.

Teaching

AGH University of Krakow's Center of Excellence in Artificial Intelligence is participating in the V4AI initiative, whose stated aim is to promote responsible and effective AI use by students, academic staff, and researchers.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: responsible_ai_use_project

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The aim of this initiative is to promote the responsible and effective use of AI by students, academic staff, and researchers, while also establishing long-term foundations for enhancing digital competences in the region.

Localized display only

The initiative aims to promote responsible and effective AI use by students, academic staff, and researchers.

Teaching

The V4AI project page says the consortium partners plan to develop guidelines and best practices for AI use in higher education and research; this is a project deliverable statement, not a binding AGH policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: guidelines_best_practices_under_development

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The project is based on the exchange of knowledge and experience among the four universities of the V4 region. Its key components include: ... the development of guidelines and best practices jointly prepared by the consortium partners.

Localized display only

The project components include development of guidelines and best practices jointly prepared by the consortium partners.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 19, 2026Last changedMay 19, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities