Policy presence
AGH University of Krakow has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Krakow, Poland
AGH University of Krakow has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 3 reviewed claims. Last checked May 19, 2026.
v1 public contract
AGH University of Krakow has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 3 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 19, 2026. Discovery context: AGH University of Krakow is listed as QS 2026 rank 801-850.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists AGH University of Krakow as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 19, 2026 and last changed on May 19, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/agh-university-of-krakow.json. The entity-level confidence is 91%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AGH University of Krakow has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
AGH University of Krakow has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
AGH University of Krakow has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
AGH University of Krakow has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
AGH University of Krakow has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
AGH University of Krakow has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
AGH University of Krakow has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
AGH University of Krakow has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: library_sciencedirect_ai_resource
Original evidence
Evidence 1ScienceDirect AI is a tool based on generative artificial intelligence, integrated with the ScienceDirect platform. ScienceDirect AI searches for information in the full texts of articles and book chapters available in the ScienceDirect database.
Localized display only
AGH University Main Library describes ScienceDirect AI as a generative-AI tool integrated with ScienceDirect for searching full texts.
Teaching
Normalized value: responsible_ai_use_project
Original evidence
Evidence 1The aim of this initiative is to promote the responsible and effective use of AI by students, academic staff, and researchers, while also establishing long-term foundations for enhancing digital competences in the region.
Localized display only
The initiative aims to promote responsible and effective AI use by students, academic staff, and researchers.
Teaching
Normalized value: guidelines_best_practices_under_development
Original evidence
Evidence 1The project is based on the exchange of knowledge and experience among the four universities of the V4 region. Its key components include: ... the development of guidelines and best practices jointly prepared by the consortium partners.
Localized display only
The project components include development of guidelines and best practices jointly prepared by the consortium partners.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
2 source attribution
bg.agh.edu.pl
cdsi.agh.edu.pl
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.