University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Turku, Finland

Abo Akademi University

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%
Public JSONChange logMonthly reportCitation rulesDataset accessAnalysis JSONSubmit correction
Public JSONCitation rules
More tools

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources2Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/abo-akademi-university.json

Policy profile

Analysis JSONAnalysis review
Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

Abo Akademi University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-abo-research-open-ai-data-boundary

Approved tools

Abo Akademi University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-abo-openuni-no-required-ai

Teaching guidance

Abo Akademi University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-abo-openuni-course-ai-disclosure

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Tools directory
Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

Åbo Akademi University's research data guidance says personal data and confidential information must never be entered into an open AI tool, and that data protection must be considered when using closed tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: Research AI guidance: no personal or confidential data in open AI tools; consider data protection for closed tools.

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Personal data and confidential information must never be entered into an open AI tool. Note that research and data management plans are included here. Take data protection into account when using closed tools.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
41e3500917b419e7a1e31cef6549799a761b6b17ee786cb38aa794763df707dc
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
Using AI in research

Ai Tool Treatment

Åbo Akademi University's Open University teacher guidance says teachers cannot require students to use AI to complete an assignment because AI requires registration on an external service.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: Open University teachers cannot require AI use for assignments when it requires external-service registration.

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The teacher cannot require students to use AI to complete an assignment, as AI requires registration on an external service.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
942e11397503e08c4c13007d802135b41e2b32f7b257df2784ab9e3214c736eb
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
AI-based applications in teaching and learning

Research

Åbo Akademi University's research data guidance says researchers are responsible for their own work, should check all AI-produced results, and should be transparent about AI-tool use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: Research AI guidance: researchers remain responsible, should check AI outputs, and should be transparent about AI-tool use.

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
You are responsible for your own work. Check all results produced with AI. The use of AI tools should be transparent.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
41e3500917b419e7a1e31cef6549799a761b6b17ee786cb38aa794763df707dc
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
Using AI in research

Teaching

Åbo Akademi University's Open University teacher guidance says students in courses should be informed about the principles and disadvantages of AI or language-model use, and teachers should make clear what applies in each specific course.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: Open University courses: teachers should inform students about AI/language-model principles and disadvantages and clarify course-specific rules.

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
In their courses, students must be informed about the principles and disadvantages of using AI/language models. The teacher should make sure that it is clear what applies in each specific course.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
942e11397503e08c4c13007d802135b41e2b32f7b257df2784ab9e3214c736eb
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
AI-based applications in teaching and learning

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Open contribution pathsReview workflow
Back to universities