Espoo (Helsinki capital region), Finland

Aalto University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage7 reviewedEvidence-backed claims7Reviewed7Candidate0Official sources5Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/aalto-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence75%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

Aalto University has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence2Sources2

Named AI services

Aalto University has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence2Sources2

Teaching guidance

Aalto University has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence2Sources1

Research guidance

Aalto University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records1

AI tools

Aalto University

Tool
AI tools
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed

Evidence-backed claims

7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Teaching

Aalto University guidance says AI-based technologies are allowed as support for teaching and learning unless the course teacher instructs otherwise, and the teacher may set course- or task-specific restrictions when learning objectives require them.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The use of AI-based technologies is allowed as a support for teaching and learning unless instructed otherwise by the teacher of the course. The teacher of the course may decide on restrictions on the use of technology on a course- or task-specific basis if achieving the learning objectives of the course requires it.

Teaching

Aalto University guidance says teachers who restrict AI use must give clear limitations connected to assessment criteria, and teachers may only require student work to be submitted through systems approved by Aalto University.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
If the teacher decides to restrict the use of AI on a course- or task-specific basis, they must provide clear instructions on the limitations in connection with the assessment criteria. The teacher may only submit student work or require students themselves to submit student work in systems approved by Aalto University.

Academic Integrity

Aalto University guidance says students remain responsible for submitted work, and using AI contrary to a teacher's instructions in a learning task is considered cheating and handled under current procedures.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The student is always responsible for the content of their submitted work. Utilising AI in a learning task contrary to the teacher instructions will be considered cheating and will be handled in accordance with the current procedures.

Academic Integrity

Aalto student guidance says students should contact the course teacher if AI use is unclear, mark AI-generated content in their text, and not present AI-generated content as their own.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
If you are unsure whether you can use a specific system or application in completing the task, always contact the course teacher. Mark the content generated by artificial intelligence in your text and include references to the name of the AI model or service, the date, and when the content was generated. Do not present content generated by artificial intelligence as your own.

Privacy

Aalto AI Assistant guidance says public, internal, and confidential data may be used in Aalto AI Assistant, but secret content and special-category or otherwise sensitive personal data are not permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
You may use public, internal, and confidential data when chatting with the Aalto AI Assistant. Secret content is not permitted. Do not input special category or otherwise sensitive personal data into the service, nor use the service to handle such data.

Ai Tool Treatment

Aalto University AI Services describes Aalto AI Assistant as an official productized AI service available to all Aaltonians, with GPT models that can be applied to public, internal, and confidential information.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Here are Aalto University official and productized AI services. Aalto AI Assistant is an AI tool that utilises large language models. The GPT models are secure and can be applied to public and internal information as well as confidential data. Aalto AI Assistant is available to all Aaltonians.

Research

Aalto University research guidance says AI cannot be given authorship, AI use in the research process should be transparently described for reproducibility, and personal data should not be fed into an online AI tool.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI cannot be given authorship, as it is considered as a tool, and authorship always involves responsibility that AI cannot cover. The use of AI should be transparent by openly describing how AI is used in the research process so that others can reproduce your results. GDPR is to be followed, meaning that research data containing personal data should not be fed into an online AI tool.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

5 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities