Change log

Aalto University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Claims7Sources5

University page Public JSON

Aalto University currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # Aalto University AI policy record
2+teaching: Aalto University guidance says AI-based technologies are allowed as support for teaching and learning unless the course teacher instructs otherwise, and the teacher may set course- or task-specific restrictions when learning objectives require them.
3+Evidence (en, 4db4b642cb22): The use of AI-based technologies is allowed as a support for teaching and learning unless instructed otherwise by the teacher of the course. The teacher of the course may decide on restrictions on the use of technology on a course- or task-specific basis if achieving the learning objectives of the course requires it.
4+teaching: Aalto University guidance says teachers who restrict AI use must give clear limitations connected to assessment criteria, and teachers may only require student work to be submitted through systems approved by Aalto University.
5+Evidence (en, 4db4b642cb22): If the teacher decides to restrict the use of AI on a course- or task-specific basis, they must provide clear instructions on the limitations in connection with the assessment criteria. The teacher may only submit student work or require students themselves to submit student work in systems approved by Aalto University.
6+academic_integrity: Aalto University guidance says students remain responsible for submitted work, and using AI contrary to a teacher's instructions in a learning task is considered cheating and handled under current procedures.
7+Evidence (en, 4db4b642cb22): The student is always responsible for the content of their submitted work. Utilising AI in a learning task contrary to the teacher instructions will be considered cheating and will be handled in accordance with the current procedures.
8+academic_integrity: Aalto student guidance says students should contact the course teacher if AI use is unclear, mark AI-generated content in their text, and not present AI-generated content as their own.
9+Evidence (en, 6d22f359e1a1): If you are unsure whether you can use a specific system or application in completing the task, always contact the course teacher. Mark the content generated by artificial intelligence in your text and include references to the name of the AI model or service, the date, and when the content was generated. Do not present content generated by artificial intelligence as your own.
10+privacy: Aalto AI Assistant guidance says public, internal, and confidential data may be used in Aalto AI Assistant, but secret content and special-category or otherwise sensitive personal data are not permitted.
11+Evidence (en, 330183fc23fd): You may use public, internal, and confidential data when chatting with the Aalto AI Assistant. Secret content is not permitted. Do not input special category or otherwise sensitive personal data into the service, nor use the service to handle such data.
12+ai_tool_treatment: Aalto University AI Services describes Aalto AI Assistant as an official productized AI service available to all Aaltonians, with GPT models that can be applied to public, internal, and confidential information.
13+Evidence (en, 886b062e76d0): Here are Aalto University official and productized AI services. Aalto AI Assistant is an AI tool that utilises large language models. The GPT models are secure and can be applied to public and internal information as well as confidential data. Aalto AI Assistant is available to all Aaltonians.
14+research: Aalto University research guidance says AI cannot be given authorship, AI use in the research process should be transparently described for reproducibility, and personal data should not be fed into an online AI tool.
15+Evidence (en, 7f99c4162b26): AI cannot be given authorship, as it is considered as a tool, and authorship always involves responsibility that AI cannot cover. The use of AI should be transparent by openly describing how AI is used in the research process so that others can reproduce your results. GDPR is to be followed, meaning that research data containing personal data should not be fed into an online AI tool.

Claim changes

7 claim records

teaching

Aalto University guidance says AI-based technologies are allowed as support for teaching and learning unless the course teacher instructs otherwise, and the teacher may set course- or task-specific restrictions when learning objectives require them.