Policy presence
University of Helsinki has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Helsinki, Finland
University of Helsinki
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
University of Helsinki has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
University of Helsinki has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Helsinki has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Helsinki has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
University of Helsinki has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Named AI services
University of Helsinki has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Helsinki has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Helsinki has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
University of Helsinki student guidance treats prohibited use of large language models, or failing to report their use as instructed, as cheating; the cheating and plagiarism guidance also lists presenting AI-generated text or solutions as one's own as plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: prohibited_or_unreported_ai_use_can_be_academic_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1If you use a large language model in a course, part of a course or examination where it is prohibited in advance, please note that this constitutes cheating.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Plagiarism includes the following: Presenting text or solutions generated by artificial intelligence as one's own.
Research
University of Helsinki research guidance supports responsible and critical use of GenAI in research, but says researchers are responsible for outputs, should verify them, describe substantial GenAI use, and must not list GenAI as a co-author.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_genai_responsibility_verification_transparency_no_coauthor
Original evidence
Evidence 1Researchers are responsible for their own use of GenAI ... you must always verify the output of GenAI ... When substantially using GenAI in your research, indicate the name of the tool and the version used.
Teaching
University of Helsinki guidance says large language models may generally be used in teaching and writing support, while course teachers can restrict or prohibit use on pedagogical grounds and AI cannot be used in maturity tests.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: general_use_allowed_with_course_restrictions_and_maturity_test_ban
Original evidence
Evidence 1As a rule, large language models may be used in teaching and in support of writing. On pedagogical grounds, course teachers can restrict or prohibit the use of large language models on their courses. In maturity tests, the use of large language models is not permitted.
Privacy
University of Helsinki IT guidance says Copilot may only be used for public or open data and not personal data, while CurreChat may process internal data but not confidential or secret data.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: copilot_public_open_only_currechat_internal_not_confidential_secret
Original evidence
Evidence 1Copilot with commercial data protection ... can only be used to process public or open data. Personal data must not be processed in Copilot. CurreChat ... can also be used to process internal data. CurreChat must not be used to process confidential or secret data.
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Helsinki identifies Microsoft Copilot with commercial data protection and CurreChat as its general-purpose generative AI services and recommends primarily using University-supported AI services.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: copilot_and_currechat_supported_services
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University of Helsinki has two general-purpose generative AI solutions: Microsoft Copilot with commercial data protection, available for all students and staff members over the age of 18, and CurreChat, which is restricted for use by the staff and for teaching purposes. We recommend primarily using AI services supported by the University, such as Copilot with commercial data protection and CurreChat.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
5 source attribution
Artificial intelligence in teaching
teaching.helsinki.fi
Generative AI at the University
helpdesk.it.helsinki.fi
Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Research
helsinki.fi
Using AI to support learning
studies.helsinki.fi
What is cheating and plagiarism?
studies.helsinki.fi