Wel doen
- Confirm the current course and assessment instructions.
- Read the saved tool audience before seeking access.
- Check where and how permitted use must be disclosed.
Alzette, Luxembourg
University of Luxembourg
Student guide · Task scope and procedure
Read the saved guidance and confirm the current course rule.
Current official guidance could not be checked for this preview. Saved claims retain their earlier evidence; they do not certify current course permission or student UniGPT access.
De onderstaande richtlijnen zijn in het Engels; officiële bewijsstukken behouden hun oorspronkelijke taal.
Er is nog geen volledige samenvatting van de studentenregels; bekijk de verzamelde uitspraken en bronnen.
Reikwijdte en overgang
Current official guidance could not be checked for this preview. Saved claims retain their earlier evidence; they do not certify current course permission or student UniGPT access.
Niet doen
- Do not pass generated output off as your own.
- Do not turn staff UniGPT access into student access.
- Do not treat saved evidence as current course approval.
AI-tools en toegang
Toegang is geen toestemming voor gebruik bij een beoordeling. Controleer opdrachtregels, toegelaten gebruikers en databeperkingen.
Gearchiveerd record; raadpleeg de officiële bron voor actuele toegang. Toegangsgegevens en citaten blijven in de oorspronkelijke taal.
- Microsoft CopilotTool genoemd; institutionele toegang niet vastgesteldBeschikbaarheid niet vastgesteld
Toegang, voorwaarden en officiële bronnen
Officiële bron 1 ↗Oorspronkelijk citaat
The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot.
- UniGPTTool genoemd; institutionele toegang niet vastgesteldBeschikbaarheid niet vastgesteld
Toegang, voorwaarden en officiële bronnen
Officiële bron 1 ↗Oorspronkelijk citaat
University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
Officiële bron 2 ↗Oorspronkelijk citaat
In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT...
Reviewed record
Beoordeelde uitspraken
Beoordeelde uitspraken: 5
Academische integriteitBeoordeelde uitspraken: 4
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeld
Genormaliseerde waarde: genai_disclosure_course_specific
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1The use of Generative AI must be disclosed in accordance with the specific guidelines communicated for each course and assessment.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeld
Genormaliseerde waarde: non_permitted_ai_practices
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1Unless explicitly authorised by the course guidelines, the following uses are non-permitted and may constitute academic misconduct: Submitting text, code, images, or other outputs generated fully or partly by AI as if they were entirely one's own work... Generating or altering data to create fake datasets, results, quotes, references, or evidence... Citing non-existent sources supplied by AI... Running outputs through multiple AI tools to conceal AI involvement.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeld
Genormaliseerde waarde: chatbot_assignment_disclosure
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1If you decide to use a chatbot for an assignment, be sure to adhere to the principles of academic integrity. This means properly citing the chatbot as a source and disclosing in which parts of the text it has been used and how it has influenced the text.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeld
Genormaliseerde waarde: unauthorized_chatbot_use_disciplinary_procedure
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1A substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use in an assignment will trigger the disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Regels voor AI-toolsBeoordeelde uitspraken: 1
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeld
Genormaliseerde waarde: microsoft_copilot_supported_unigpt_staff
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot. Students are encouraged to prioritise this tool, as it is supported within the University environment and offers stronger institutional safeguards than other public platforms. In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT... At present, access to UniGPT is limited to University staff.
Source record
Officiële bronnen
Bronnen: 2
Open de lijst met officiële bronnen
Chatbots and student assessment
uni.lu
- Hash van momentopname
- e0b4f0f9…
Guidelines on the Use of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning
uni.lu
- Bron-URL
- https://www.uni.lu/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2026/02/25170716/2026-Guidelines-AI-I2TL-16022026.pdf
- Hash van momentopname
- b25b8a04…
Dossierinformatie, JSON en bronvermelding
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Luxembourg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-luxembourg
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Wijzigingslogboek openenSaved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.