University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Taal
ENZHFRPLNL

Alzette, Luxembourg

University of Luxembourg

RanglijstQS World University Rankings 2026: =381Updated16 mei 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Beoordeelde beweringen

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen91%

Genormaliseerde waarde: genai_disclosure_course_specific

Laatst gecontroleerd
16 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
16 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
The use of Generative AI must be disclosed in accordance with the specific guidelines communicated for each course and assessment.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
b25b8a04…
Opgehaald
16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Guidelines for learning; Disclosure requirements

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%

Genormaliseerde waarde: microsoft_copilot_supported_unigpt_staff

Laatst gecontroleerd
16 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
16 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot. Students are encouraged to prioritise this tool, as it is supported within the University environment and offers stronger institutional safeguards than other public platforms. In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT... At present, access to UniGPT is limited to University staff.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
b25b8a04…
Opgehaald
16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
AI tools supported by the University of Luxembourg

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen89%

Genormaliseerde waarde: non_permitted_ai_practices

Laatst gecontroleerd
16 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
16 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Unless explicitly authorised by the course guidelines, the following uses are non-permitted and may constitute academic misconduct: Submitting text, code, images, or other outputs generated fully or partly by AI as if they were entirely one's own work... Generating or altering data to create fake datasets, results, quotes, references, or evidence... Citing non-existent sources supplied by AI... Running outputs through multiple AI tools to conceal AI involvement.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
b25b8a04…
Opgehaald
16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Risks and limitations; Non-permitted AI practices

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen87%

Genormaliseerde waarde: chatbot_assignment_disclosure

Laatst gecontroleerd
16 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
16 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
If you decide to use a chatbot for an assignment, be sure to adhere to the principles of academic integrity. This means properly citing the chatbot as a source and disclosing in which parts of the text it has been used and how it has influenced the text.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
e0b4f0f9…
Opgehaald
16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Chatbots and citations - Can they be cited in an academic assignment?

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen86%

Genormaliseerde waarde: unauthorized_chatbot_use_disciplinary_procedure

Laatst gecontroleerd
16 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
16 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
A substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use in an assignment will trigger the disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
e0b4f0f9…
Opgehaald
16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Consequences of illicit chatbot use

Source record

Officiële bronnen

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Beoordelenagent reviewedVertrouwen91%Snapshot statusNiet gepubliceerdJSONOpenbaar JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Luxembourg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-luxembourg

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Wijzigingslogboek openen