Jena, Germany

Universität Jena

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Beoordeelde beweringen

6 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

HAWKI is listed for Universität Jena in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen97%

Genormaliseerde waarde: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"HAWKI","description":"Secure higher-education AI chatbot platform providing ChatGPT GPT-4o and GPT-4o mini.","howToObtain":"Use federated Shibboleth login with a valid Uni Jena account.","costToUser":"Not stated.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
The Thuringian Universities IT Centre provides HAWKI as a secure AI chatbot platform with GPT-4o models.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

The Thuringian Universities IT Centre provides HAWKI as a secure AI chatbot platform with GPT-4o models.

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 2
The service is available to Uni Jena employees with a valid university account through federated Shibboleth login.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

The service is available to Uni Jena employees with a valid university account through federated Shibboleth login.

Academic Integrity

Universität Jena's exam-law page states that if AI is used in examinations, the examiner must expressly allow AI as an aid and students must state the use of tools such as ChatGPT for the assessment.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%

Genormaliseerde waarde: Exam AI use requires express examiner permission and disclosure by students.

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
In diesem Fall muss die Prüferin bzw. Prüfer die KI ausdrücklich als Hilfsmittel zulassen. Die Studierenden müssen dann die Nutzung von z.B. ChatGPT für die Prüfungsleistung angeben.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

The examiner must expressly allow AI as an aid; students must then indicate use of tools such as ChatGPT for the assessment.

Academic Integrity

For study and teaching contexts, Universität Jena guidance says AI use in scientific work or examinations may be used only as a supporting aid and only after consultation with the examiner.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen91%

Genormaliseerde waarde: AI in scientific work or exams is limited to supportive use after consultation with the examiner.

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Ein KI-Einsatz darf daher in diesem Kontext nur als unterstützendes Hilfsmittel eingesetzt werden und nur nach Absprache mit dem Prüfenden.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

In this context, AI may be used only as a supporting aid and only after consultation with the examiner.

Privacy

Universität Jena guidance says generative AI tools must not be used as the basis or final decision for person-related decisions, including student examination assessments and researcher grant assessments.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%

Genormaliseerde waarde: No AI basis or final decision for person-related decisions.

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Generative KI-Tools dürfen nicht als Grundlage oder gar Letztentscheidung für personenbezogene Entscheidungen herangezogen werden (vgl. Art. 22 Datenschutz-Grundverordnung).

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Generative AI tools may not be used as the basis or final decision for person-related decisions.

Academic Integrity

In its written-work self-declaration guidance, Universität Jena's exam-law page states that where there is no AI release declaration, AI use is impermissible by inference from the listed release options.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%

Genormaliseerde waarde: The exam-law page links AI-use permissibility to the written-work release-declaration options.

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Gibt es keine Freigabeerklärung, ist jegliche Nutzung von KI (im Rückschluss von den Freigabemöglichkeiten) unzulässig.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

If there is no release declaration, any AI use is impermissible by inference from the release options.

Ai Tool Treatment

Universität Jena guidance says generative AI use should be possible where it can be used beneficially and without risks, with users expected to follow responsible, reflective, and legally compliant use guidance.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen88%

Genormaliseerde waarde: Generative AI use may be possible where beneficial and low-risk, subject to responsible/legal-use guidance.

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Dort wo generative KI gewinnbringend und ohne Risiken angewendet werden kann, soll eine Nutzung daher möglich sein.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Where generative AI can be used beneficially and without risks, use should be possible.

Source record

Officiële bronnen

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Beoordelenagent reviewedVertrouwen97%Snapshot statusNiet gepubliceerdJSONOpenbaar JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universität Jena AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universitat-jena

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Wijzigingslogboek openen