University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Jena, Germany

Universität Jena

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%
Public JSONChange logMonthly reportCitation rulesDataset accessAnalysis JSONSubmit correction
Public JSONCitation rules
More tools

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources2Source languagedePublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universitat-jena.json

Policy profile

Analysis JSONAnalysis review
Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

Privacy and data entry

Universität Jena has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-jena-no-personal-decisions-by-ai

Research guidance

Universität Jena has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-jena-no-personal-decisions-by-ai

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Tools directory
Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

Universität Jena's exam-law page states that if AI is used in examinations, the examiner must expressly allow AI as an aid and students must state the use of tools such as ChatGPT for the assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: Exam AI use requires express examiner permission and disclosure by students.

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
In diesem Fall muss die Prüferin bzw. Prüfer die KI ausdrücklich als Hilfsmittel zulassen. Die Studierenden müssen dann die Nutzung von z.B. ChatGPT für die Prüfungsleistung angeben.

Localized display only

The examiner must expressly allow AI as an aid; students must then indicate use of tools such as ChatGPT for the assessment.

Source language
de
Snapshot hash
428f58aa257ee87cd1757ecd466277906aef887e18e7a7940351876ae9386f46
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Aktuelle rechtliche Lage

Academic Integrity

For study and teaching contexts, Universität Jena guidance says AI use in scientific work or examinations may be used only as a supporting aid and only after consultation with the examiner.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: AI in scientific work or exams is limited to supportive use after consultation with the examiner.

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Ein KI-Einsatz darf daher in diesem Kontext nur als unterstützendes Hilfsmittel eingesetzt werden und nur nach Absprache mit dem Prüfenden.

Localized display only

In this context, AI may be used only as a supporting aid and only after consultation with the examiner.

Source language
de
Snapshot hash
b83f352ce7177caf927d3b85579406f581e8848991c4e2d641cfb3e79dae8ed1
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Allgemeine Hinweise zum Einsatz von KI in bestimmten Bereichen; Studium und Lehre

Privacy

Universität Jena guidance says generative AI tools must not be used as the basis or final decision for person-related decisions, including student examination assessments and researcher grant assessments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: No AI basis or final decision for person-related decisions.

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Generative KI-Tools dürfen nicht als Grundlage oder gar Letztentscheidung für personenbezogene Entscheidungen herangezogen werden (vgl. Art. 22 Datenschutz-Grundverordnung).

Localized display only

Generative AI tools may not be used as the basis or final decision for person-related decisions.

Source language
de
Snapshot hash
b83f352ce7177caf927d3b85579406f581e8848991c4e2d641cfb3e79dae8ed1
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Was muss bei der Nutzung von generativen KI-Tools beachtet werden?; Entscheidungsfindung ohne KI

Academic Integrity

In its written-work self-declaration guidance, Universität Jena's exam-law page states that where there is no AI release declaration, AI use is impermissible by inference from the listed release options.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: The exam-law page links AI-use permissibility to the written-work release-declaration options.

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Gibt es keine Freigabeerklärung, ist jegliche Nutzung von KI (im Rückschluss von den Freigabemöglichkeiten) unzulässig.

Localized display only

If there is no release declaration, any AI use is impermissible by inference from the release options.

Source language
de
Snapshot hash
428f58aa257ee87cd1757ecd466277906aef887e18e7a7940351876ae9386f46
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Anpassung der Eigenständigkeitserklärung für KI in Haus- und Abschlussarbeiten

Ai Tool Treatment

Universität Jena guidance says generative AI use should be possible where it can be used beneficially and without risks, with users expected to follow responsible, reflective, and legally compliant use guidance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: Generative AI use may be possible where beneficial and low-risk, subject to responsible/legal-use guidance.

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Dort wo generative KI gewinnbringend und ohne Risiken angewendet werden kann, soll eine Nutzung daher möglich sein.

Localized display only

Where generative AI can be used beneficially and without risks, use should be possible.

Source language
de
Snapshot hash
b83f352ce7177caf927d3b85579406f581e8848991c4e2d641cfb3e79dae8ed1
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Unter welchen Voraussetzungen ist der Einsatz an der Universität möglich?

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Open contribution pathsReview workflow
Back to universities