Change log

Universität Jena

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Universität Jena currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Universität Jena current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+10-0
11 # Universität Jena AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Universität Jena's exam-law page states that if AI is used in examinations, the examiner must expressly allow AI as an aid and students must state the use of tools such as ChatGPT for the assessment.
3+Evidence (de, 428f58aa257e): In diesem Fall muss die Prüferin bzw. Prüfer die KI ausdrücklich als Hilfsmittel zulassen. Die Studierenden müssen dann die Nutzung von z.B. ChatGPT für die Prüfungsleistung angeben.
4+academic_integrity: For study and teaching contexts, Universität Jena guidance says AI use in scientific work or examinations may be used only as a supporting aid and only after consultation with the examiner.
5+Evidence (de, b83f352ce717): Ein KI-Einsatz darf daher in diesem Kontext nur als unterstützendes Hilfsmittel eingesetzt werden und nur nach Absprache mit dem Prüfenden.
6+privacy: Universität Jena guidance says generative AI tools must not be used as the basis or final decision for person-related decisions, including student examination assessments and researcher grant assessments.
7+Evidence (de, b83f352ce717): Generative KI-Tools dürfen nicht als Grundlage oder gar Letztentscheidung für personenbezogene Entscheidungen herangezogen werden (vgl. Art. 22 Datenschutz-Grundverordnung).
8+academic_integrity: In its written-work self-declaration guidance, Universität Jena's exam-law page states that where there is no AI release declaration, AI use is impermissible by inference from the listed release options.
9+Evidence (de, 428f58aa257e): Gibt es keine Freigabeerklärung, ist jegliche Nutzung von KI (im Rückschluss von den Freigabemöglichkeiten) unzulässig.
10+ai_tool_treatment: Universität Jena guidance says generative AI use should be possible where it can be used beneficially and without risks, with users expected to follow responsible, reflective, and legally compliant use guidance.
11+Evidence (de, b83f352ce717): Dort wo generative KI gewinnbringend und ohne Risiken angewendet werden kann, soll eine Nutzung daher möglich sein.

Claim changes

5 claim records

academic_integrity

In its written-work self-declaration guidance, Universität Jena's exam-law page states that where there is no AI release declaration, AI use is impermissible by inference from the listed release options.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

Universität Jena's exam-law page states that if AI is used in examinations, the examiner must expressly allow AI as an aid and students must state the use of tools such as ChatGPT for the assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesde

privacy

Universität Jena guidance says generative AI tools must not be used as the basis or final decision for person-related decisions, including student examination assessments and researcher grant assessments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

For study and teaching contexts, Universität Jena guidance says AI use in scientific work or examinations may be used only as a supporting aid and only after consultation with the examiner.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesde

ai_tool_treatment

Universität Jena guidance says generative AI use should be possible where it can be used beneficially and without risks, with users expected to follow responsible, reflective, and legally compliant use guidance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesde

Source snapshots

2 source attributions