academic_integrity
In its written-work self-declaration guidance, Universität Jena's exam-law page states that where there is no AI release declaration, AI use is impermissible by inference from the listed release options.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Universität Jena
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Universität Jena currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Universität Jena. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Universität Jena combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # Universität Jena AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Universität Jena's exam-law page states that if AI is used in examinations, the examiner must expressly allow AI as an aid and students must state the use of tools such as ChatGPT for the assessment.
3+Evidence (de, 428f58aa257e): In diesem Fall muss die Prüferin bzw. Prüfer die KI ausdrücklich als Hilfsmittel zulassen. Die Studierenden müssen dann die Nutzung von z.B. ChatGPT für die Prüfungsleistung angeben.
4+academic_integrity: For study and teaching contexts, Universität Jena guidance says AI use in scientific work or examinations may be used only as a supporting aid and only after consultation with the examiner.
5+Evidence (de, b83f352ce717): Ein KI-Einsatz darf daher in diesem Kontext nur als unterstützendes Hilfsmittel eingesetzt werden und nur nach Absprache mit dem Prüfenden.
6+privacy: Universität Jena guidance says generative AI tools must not be used as the basis or final decision for person-related decisions, including student examination assessments and researcher grant assessments.
7+Evidence (de, b83f352ce717): Generative KI-Tools dürfen nicht als Grundlage oder gar Letztentscheidung für personenbezogene Entscheidungen herangezogen werden (vgl. Art. 22 Datenschutz-Grundverordnung).
8+academic_integrity: In its written-work self-declaration guidance, Universität Jena's exam-law page states that where there is no AI release declaration, AI use is impermissible by inference from the listed release options.
9+Evidence (de, 428f58aa257e): Gibt es keine Freigabeerklärung, ist jegliche Nutzung von KI (im Rückschluss von den Freigabemöglichkeiten) unzulässig.
10+ai_tool_treatment: Universität Jena guidance says generative AI use should be possible where it can be used beneficially and without risks, with users expected to follow responsible, reflective, and legally compliant use guidance.
11+Evidence (de, b83f352ce717): Dort wo generative KI gewinnbringend und ohne Risiken angewendet werden kann, soll eine Nutzung daher möglich sein.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
5 claim records
academic_integrity
Universität Jena's exam-law page states that if AI is used in examinations, the examiner must expressly allow AI as an aid and students must state the use of tools such as ChatGPT for the assessment.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Universität Jena guidance says generative AI tools must not be used as the basis or final decision for person-related decisions, including student examination assessments and researcher grant assessments.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
For study and teaching contexts, Universität Jena guidance says AI use in scientific work or examinations may be used only as a supporting aid and only after consultation with the examiner.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Universität Jena guidance says generative AI use should be possible where it can be used beneficially and without risks, with users expected to follow responsible, reflective, and legally compliant use guidance.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
2 source attributions
Informationen zum Prüfungsrecht
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 3:56 AM
Umgang mit generativen KI-Tools an der Universität Jena
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 3:55 AM