public-release-20260718-008
Comparé à public-release-20260717-001.
différentiel Universität Jena public-release-20260718-008
Comparaison de public-release-20260717-001 avec public-release-20260718-008.
Journal des modifications
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.
Universität Jena currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 19 juil. 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour Universität Jena. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.
Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.
Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.
Comparaison de public-release-20260717-001 avec public-release-20260718-008.
1 diff de publication publique
Comparé à public-release-20260717-001.
Comparaison de public-release-20260717-001 avec public-release-20260718-008.
6 Affirmation enregistrements
HAWKI is listed for Universität Jena in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
In its written-work self-declaration guidance, Universität Jena's exam-law page states that where there is no AI release declaration, AI use is impermissible by inference from the listed release options.
Universität Jena's exam-law page states that if AI is used in examinations, the examiner must expressly allow AI as an aid and students must state the use of tools such as ChatGPT for the assessment.
Universität Jena guidance says generative AI tools must not be used as the basis or final decision for person-related decisions, including student examination assessments and researcher grant assessments.
For study and teaching contexts, Universität Jena guidance says AI use in scientific work or examinations may be used only as a supporting aid and only after consultation with the examiner.
Universität Jena guidance says generative AI use should be possible where it can be used beneficially and without risks, with users expected to follow responsible, reflective, and legally compliant use guidance.
3 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 19 juil. 2026, 03:11
official_guidance Tracker checked at 17 mai 2026, 03:56
official_guidance Tracker checked at 17 mai 2026, 03:55