University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Taal
ENZHFRPLNL

Manila, Philippines

De La Salle University

RanglijstQS World University Rankings 2026: =654Updated18 mei 2026

Reviewed policy snapshot

De La Salle University's generative-AI policy is course- and disclosure-focused and explicitly limited to generative AI rather than AI generally.

Do

  • Check current research-specific instructions before using generative AI.
  • Keep personal, confidential, and proprietary information out of generative-AI services.
  • Provide the written generative-AI disclosure required by the policy.

Don't

  • Do not infer research permission from the policy's stated scope alone.
  • Do not upload internal university documents or proprietary research.
  • Do not omit disclosure when generative AI was used.

Audience

For researchers · Research and publication

Reviewed material is available for this audience.

Coursework & assignments

Conditional

DLSU requires each course syllabus to state generative-AI use levels, while prohibited use or failure to disclose can be academic dishonesty.

Scope: Mixed scopeAssignment
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

Starting Term 1, 2025-2026, DLSU's policy says every course must include a dedicated Generative AI Use Policy section in the syllabus, including usage policy levels for grading components and a concise rationale.
Door agent beoordeeld
Starting Term 1, 2025-2026, every course must include an explicit declaration of AI usage policies in a dedicated section of the syllabus with the heading Generative AI Use Policy.
DLSU's policy treats prohibited generative AI use and failure to disclose generative AI use as generative AI-related academic dishonesty, while also stating that AI detector results cannot be the sole basis for establishing such dishonesty.
Door agent beoordeeld
For students, the following shall be considered as generative AI-related academic dishonesty: Using generative AI in producing a submission in a way that is prohibited by the usage policy defined for that assessment, even if it was disclosed; Failing to properly disclose the use of generative AI in a submission.
Faculty can use AI detector tools (Turnitin, GPTZero, etc.) for flagging suspicious submissions. However, results of such tools cannot be used as the sole basis for establishing generative AI-related academic dishonesty, as these tools can produce both false positives and false negatives.

Exams & assessment

Not mentioned in reviewed sources

No exam-specific rule is included in the retained DLSU basis.

Scope: Mixed scope
Reviewed evidence & official sources

No reviewed evidence is included in this dimension.

Disclosure & citation

Required

DLSU says faculty and students must provide a written disclosure statement when generative AI is used in material, presentations, or submissions.

Scope: Mixed scopeAssignmentResearch
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

DLSU's generative AI policy says faculty and students must provide a written disclosure statement when generative AI is used in producing material, presentations, or submissions.
Door agent beoordeeld
For both faculty and students, the use of generative AI in the production of any material, presentation, or submission, must be accompanied by a written disclosure statement.

Privacy & sensitive data

Restricted

DLSU's policy says personal, highly sensitive, internal, proprietary, and confidential information should never be shared with generative-AI services.

Scope: Mixed scopeAssignmentResearch
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

DLSU's policy says personal and highly sensitive information, internal university documents, proprietary research, and confidential information should never be shared with generative AI services.
Door agent beoordeeld
Personal and highly sensitive information should never be shared with generative AI services. Internal University documents, proprietary research, and confidential information should never be shared with generative AI services.

University-provided AI tools

Not mentioned in reviewed sources

No approved or institutionally provided AI-tool list is included in this snapshot.

Scope: Mixed scopeProvision ≠ coursework permission
Reviewed evidence & official sources

No reviewed evidence is included in this dimension.

Research & publication

Insufficient public evidence

The cited policy says it applies to research, but the retained public basis does not provide research-specific permission or prohibition.

Scope: Mixed scopeResearch
Reviewed evidence & official sources

Reviewed evidence

De La Salle University has an official policy document for generative AI use in teaching, learning, and research, and the policy states that it applies only to generative AI rather than AI in general.
Door agent beoordeeld
This policy applies to the use of generative AI in De La Salle University for teaching, learning, and research. It applies only to generative AI, not AI in general.

Reviewed record

Beoordeelde beweringen

5 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

DLSU's generative AI policy says faculty and students must provide a written disclosure statement when generative AI is used in producing material, presentations, or submissions.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%

Genormaliseerde waarde: written disclosure required for generative AI use in materials and submissions

Laatst gecontroleerd
18 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
18 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
For both faculty and students, the use of generative AI in the production of any material, presentation, or submission, must be accompanied by a written disclosure statement.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

DLSU requires written disclosure when faculty or students use generative AI in producing materials, presentations, or submissions.

Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
31b25b9b…
Opgehaald
18 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Section IV.b, Disclosure Requirements

Onderwijs

Starting Term 1, 2025-2026, DLSU's policy says every course must include a dedicated Generative AI Use Policy section in the syllabus, including usage policy levels for grading components and a concise rationale.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%

Genormaliseerde waarde: course syllabi must declare generative AI usage policies starting Term 1 2025-2026

Laatst gecontroleerd
18 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
18 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Starting Term 1, 2025-2026, every course must include an explicit declaration of AI usage policies in a dedicated section of the syllabus with the heading Generative AI Use Policy.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Beginning Term 1, 2025-2026, every course syllabus must include a dedicated Generative AI Use Policy section.

Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
31b25b9b…
Opgehaald
18 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Section IV.c, Declaration of Generative AI Use Policy in Course Syllabi

Privacy

DLSU's policy says personal and highly sensitive information, internal university documents, proprietary research, and confidential information should never be shared with generative AI services.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%

Genormaliseerde waarde: do not share personal, sensitive, internal, proprietary, or confidential information with generative AI services

Laatst gecontroleerd
18 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
18 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Personal and highly sensitive information should never be shared with generative AI services. Internal University documents, proprietary research, and confidential information should never be shared with generative AI services.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

The policy says personal, highly sensitive, internal, proprietary, and confidential information should never be shared with generative AI services.

Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
31b25b9b…
Opgehaald
18 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Section IV.e, Data Privacy and Intellectual Property

Source Status

De La Salle University has an official policy document for generative AI use in teaching, learning, and research, and the policy states that it applies only to generative AI rather than AI in general.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%

Genormaliseerde waarde: official generative AI policy for teaching, learning, and research

Laatst gecontroleerd
18 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
18 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
This policy applies to the use of generative AI in De La Salle University for teaching, learning, and research. It applies only to generative AI, not AI in general.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

The policy is scoped to generative AI use at DLSU for teaching, learning, and research.

Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
31b25b9b…
Opgehaald
18 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Section II, Scope

Academic Integrity

DLSU's policy treats prohibited generative AI use and failure to disclose generative AI use as generative AI-related academic dishonesty, while also stating that AI detector results cannot be the sole basis for establishing such dishonesty.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%

Genormaliseerde waarde: prohibited or undisclosed generative AI use is academic dishonesty; AI detector output alone is insufficient

Laatst gecontroleerd
18 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
18 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
For students, the following shall be considered as generative AI-related academic dishonesty: Using generative AI in producing a submission in a way that is prohibited by the usage policy defined for that assessment, even if it was disclosed; Failing to properly disclose the use of generative AI in a submission.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

The policy classifies prohibited generative AI use and failure to disclose generative AI use as academic dishonesty.

Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
31b25b9b…
Opgehaald
18 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Section IV.d, Handling of Generative AI-Related Academic Dishonesty

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 2
Faculty can use AI detector tools (Turnitin, GPTZero, etc.) for flagging suspicious submissions. However, results of such tools cannot be used as the sole basis for establishing generative AI-related academic dishonesty, as these tools can produce both false positives and false negatives.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

AI detector results may flag submissions but cannot be the sole basis for establishing generative AI-related academic dishonesty.

Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
31b25b9b…
Opgehaald
18 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Section IV.d, AI detector tools

Source record

Officiële bronnen

1 source

Record information, JSON & citation
Beoordelenagent reviewedVertrouwen95%Snapshot statusstrongSnapshot-hash44403990…JSONOpenbaar JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "De La Salle University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 18, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/de-la-salle-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Wijzigingslogboek openen