University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPLESNLMSJAKOPTARRUDEITCSTRFISVDANBHULTIDVITHFAHEHIURBNUKELZH-HANT

Manila, Philippines Last checked

De La Salle University

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities
Can I use AI for my coursework?Conditional in this scopeDo I need to disclose AI use?Required in this scopeCan I upload sensitive data?Source guidanceWhich tools can I access?Evidence gap or scope limits
Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautionsRecord updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Conditional in this scope

The syllabus must state GenAI policy for relevant assessed components. An individual assessment may override it when communicated with the assessment specifications.

Official source ↗

Exams

Evidence gap or scope limits

Exam permission depends on the communicated assessment policy; disclosure does not make a prohibited use acceptable.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Required in this scope

Disclose the tool and how much it influenced the output. A separate statement is unnecessary when disclosure is already embedded or the specified activity makes the use obvious.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Source guidance

Personal or highly sensitive information, internal university documents, proprietary research and confidential information should never be shared with GenAI services.

Official source ↗

Institutional tools

Evidence gap or scope limits

The policy names tools as examples but does not establish a university licence, free access or universal assessment approval.

Research and publication

Required in this scope

Research participant data use must be declared in informed consent, anonymised, and ethically approved when necessary; venue-specific disclosure requirements also apply.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Restrictions in this scope

Using GenAI in a prohibited way can constitute dishonesty even if disclosed. Detector output alone cannot justify rejecting work or imposing a grade penalty.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Required in this scope

Teachers must communicate assessment-specific overrides and any extra disclosure requirements when releasing the activity specifications.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Evidence gap or scope limits

GenAI use remains subject to existing privacy, intellectual-property and research-ethics rules; a separate procurement approval process was not established.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Disclose AI use, preserving the exceptions to a separate statement.
    Requirement in this scope

Don’t

  • Do not use GenAI in a way the assessment prohibits, even if disclosed.
    Requirement in this scope
AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

AI use questioned?

De La Salle University

Use the source-specific audience, assessment and publication limits below. Institution-wide policy review remains PARTIAL.

Investigation & response

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

AI tools & access

No source-backed tool record has been established for this university yet. This does not mean AI tools are unavailable or prohibited.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 1

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

Records cover only part of this period, starting 2026-10-27.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

4

Historical and pending public Claims (1)

These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.

claim-dlsu-generative-ai-disclosure · excluded_pending_review

Original public Claim retained in its source-specific scope; institution audit remains PARTIAL.

Excluded from current conclusions pending source, temporal or normative review; original text and evidence retained.

Record history

Official sources

1 official URLs; 1 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Policies on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

old.dlsu.edu.ph

University official source

old.dlsu.edu.ph

Hash and captured version

Policies on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education · 2026-05-18T00:41:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

31b25b9b5073abb49d65320953056a69fabc6e112858a4cda77e68c997582122

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
v6-reading-rankings-ten-20261027
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Pending independent agent review; not an approved snapshot
Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • Institution-wide semantic audit remains PARTIAL. Private historical objects and every new requirement are not automatically accepted by public-Claim review.
  • New evidence retains original bytes where obtained; other items are reviewer excerpts or historical snapshots and do not establish full original documents.
  • Unchanged public APIs, snapshots, MCP, history and tool records do not adopt this local candidate.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        The syllabus must state GenAI policy for relevant assessed components. An individual assessment may override it when communicated with the assessment specifications.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        Disclose the tool and how much it influenced the output. A separate statement is unnecessary when disclosure is already embedded or the specified activity makes the use obvious.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        Personal or highly sensitive information, internal university documents, proprietary research and confidential information should never be shared with GenAI services.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        The policy names tools as examples but does not establish a university licence, free access or universal assessment approval.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        Exam permission depends on the communicated assessment policy; disclosure does not make a prohibited use acceptable.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        Research participant data use must be declared in informed consent, anonymised, and ethically approved when necessary; venue-specific disclosure requirements also apply.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        Using GenAI in a prohibited way can constitute dishonesty even if disclosed. Detector output alone cannot justify rejecting work or imposing a grade penalty.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        Teachers must communicate assessment-specific overrides and any extra disclosure requirements when releasing the activity specifications.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        GenAI use remains subject to existing privacy, intellectual-property and research-ethics rules; a separate procurement approval process was not established.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        4 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →