public-release-20260715-005
Vergeleken met public-release-20260714-002.
Queen Mary University of London public-release-20260715-005 verschil
public-release-20260714-002 vergelijken met public-release-20260715-005.
Wijzigingslogboek
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.
Queen Mary University of London currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 7 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 19 jul 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 1 source snapshot changes.
Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor Queen Mary University of London. Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.
Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.
Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.
public-release-20260714-002 vergelijken met public-release-20260715-005.
1 verschil openbare publicatie
Vergeleken met public-release-20260714-002.
public-release-20260714-002 vergelijken met public-release-20260715-005.
8 Claimen registers
Built-in Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for Queen Mary University of London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Queen Mary staff guidance says open-access GenAI tools are not secure for institutional data, and directs staff to use institutional Microsoft Copilot for sensitive, confidential, or internal-use-only information while not sharing internal-use Queen Mary data with external AI tools.
Queen Mary student guidance says any use of Generative AI must align with the Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy, and that AI use may be acceptable in some scenarios but not all.
Queen Mary Doctoral College guidance tells postgraduate researchers to decide with supervisors which GenAI systems to use and why, keep detailed records of inputs and outputs, and reference and declare GenAI use in their work.
Queen Mary IT FAQs say staff using built-in Copilot with a Queen Mary account get Microsoft 365 environment protections, and inputs are not stored or used for external model training.
Queen Mary publishes an official AI education guidance page that links AI principles, staff guidance, student guidance, PGR guidance, academic integrity resources, and the Policy Zone rather than presenting the guidance page itself as a standalone binding AI policy.
Queen Mary IT FAQs say staff intending to use Queen Mary data with a free AI tool must submit the tool for approval through the Ideas portal before using it.
Queen Mary’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy applies to all Queen Mary students and says actions undermining academic integrity may be misconduct in assessment or learning activities, including formative assessment.
7 source attributions
official_policy_page Tracker checked at 14 mei 2026, 05:15
official_guidance Tracker checked at 14 mei 2026, 05:15
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 jul 2026, 00:01
official_guidance Tracker checked at 14 mei 2026, 05:15
official_guidance Tracker checked at 14 mei 2026, 05:15
official_guidance Tracker checked at 14 mei 2026, 05:15
official_guidance Tracker checked at 14 mei 2026, 05:15