University AI Policy Tracker

Rekod dasar AI universiti yang terbuka dan berasaskan bukti untuk kegunaan awam.

APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Norwegian University of Life Sciences

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 19, 2026Last changedMay 19, 2026Claims6Sources4Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Norwegian University of Life Sciences currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 19, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Norwegian University of Life Sciences combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # Norwegian University of Life Sciences AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: NMBU's generative AI guidelines require students to clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used, and to account for AI use in assignments or other work submitted for assessment or compulsory activity.
3+Evidence (en, 53fa156a3c82): The student must follow academic norms of honesty, diligence, and openness, and clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used. If the student uses AI-based programs in a submitted assignment or in other work to be submitted for assessment or as a compulsory activity in a course, the student must account for the use.
4+ai_tool_treatment: NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs are permitted in accordance with the guidelines, while individual course descriptions may state that AI-based programs are not permitted for exams or other assessed work.
5+Evidence (en, 53fa156a3c82): At NMBU, the use of AI-based programs is permitted in accordance with these guidelines. In the online course description for each individual course, it may be stated that AI-based programs are not permitted for use in exams or in other work submitted for assessment in the course.
6+ai_tool_treatment: NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs will normally not be permitted in written examinations on campus; for take-home exams, students must follow the AI-use specifications in the exam paper and course description.
7+Evidence (en, 53fa156a3c82): In written examinations on campus, the use of AI-based programs will normally not be permitted. In take-home exams, of shorter or longer duration, the student must comply with specifications regarding the use of AI given in the individual exam paper and in the course description.
8+ai_tool_treatment: NMBU student guidance says each course description should state permitted AI use for assessment and compulsory activities, using three categories: K1 no AI use, K2 specified AI use, and K3 full AI use aligned with NMBU AI guidelines.
9+Evidence (nb, 4556959d8fbc): I emnebeskrivelsen skal det stå informasjon om tillatt bruk av KI i emnet. Dette feltet skal inneholde en beskrivelse av hvordan KI er tillatt brukt ved de forskjellige vurderingsformene og de obligatoriske aktivitetene som emnet har. Det er 3 mulige kategorier av KI-bruk.
10+privacy: NMBU's Norwegian student guidance tells students not to use AI to process personal data or sensitive matters.
11+Evidence (nb, 4556959d8fbc): Det er viktig å: bruke KI som støtte, ikke som erstatning for egen tenkning; kritisk vurdere kvaliteten på svarene du får; alltid oppgi bruk av KI i akademiske arbeider og merk tydelig materiale generert av språkmodeller; ikke bruke KI til å behandle personopplysninger eller sensitive saker.
12+academic_integrity: NMBU's Norwegian cheating and plagiarism page warns that incorrect or improper use of AI tools such as ChatGPT can create suspicion of attempted cheating and/or plagiarism, with possible consequences including annulment and exclusion.
13+Evidence (nb, 2d4d3862a0ca): Husk at feil bruk av kunstig intelligens (KI)/artificial intelligence (AI) som eks. ChatGPT eller andre kan medføre mistanke om forsøk på fusk og/eller plagiering. Dette kan få alvorlige konsekvenser for deg.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

6 claim records

academic_integrity

NMBU's Norwegian cheating and plagiarism page warns that incorrect or improper use of AI tools such as ChatGPT can create suspicion of attempted cheating and/or plagiarism, with possible consequences including annulment and exclusion.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesnb

privacy

NMBU's Norwegian student guidance tells students not to use AI to process personal data or sensitive matters.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesnb

ai_tool_treatment

NMBU student guidance says each course description should state permitted AI use for assessment and compulsory activities, using three categories: K1 no AI use, K2 specified AI use, and K3 full AI use aligned with NMBU AI guidelines.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesnb

ai_tool_treatment

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs will normally not be permitted in written examinations on campus; for take-home exams, students must follow the AI-use specifications in the exam paper and course description.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

NMBU's generative AI guidelines require students to clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used, and to account for AI use in assignments or other work submitted for assessment or compulsory activity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs are permitted in accordance with the guidelines, while individual course descriptions may state that AI-based programs are not permitted for exams or other assessed work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions