University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

变更日志

Norwegian University of Life Sciences

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

审核: 智能体已审核最后检查时间2026年5月19日最后更改时间2026年5月19日声明6来源4版本记录0
大学页面公开 JSON月度报告大学索引

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Norwegian University of Life Sciences currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月19日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Norwegian University of Life Sciences。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Norwegian University of Life Sciences combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # Norwegian University of Life Sciences AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: NMBU's generative AI guidelines require students to clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used, and to account for AI use in assignments or other work submitted for assessment or compulsory activity.
3+Evidence (en, 53fa156a3c82): The student must follow academic norms of honesty, diligence, and openness, and clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used. If the student uses AI-based programs in a submitted assignment or in other work to be submitted for assessment or as a compulsory activity in a course, the student must account for the use.
4+ai_tool_treatment: NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs are permitted in accordance with the guidelines, while individual course descriptions may state that AI-based programs are not permitted for exams or other assessed work.
5+Evidence (en, 53fa156a3c82): At NMBU, the use of AI-based programs is permitted in accordance with these guidelines. In the online course description for each individual course, it may be stated that AI-based programs are not permitted for use in exams or in other work submitted for assessment in the course.
6+ai_tool_treatment: NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs will normally not be permitted in written examinations on campus; for take-home exams, students must follow the AI-use specifications in the exam paper and course description.
7+Evidence (en, 53fa156a3c82): In written examinations on campus, the use of AI-based programs will normally not be permitted. In take-home exams, of shorter or longer duration, the student must comply with specifications regarding the use of AI given in the individual exam paper and in the course description.
8+ai_tool_treatment: NMBU student guidance says each course description should state permitted AI use for assessment and compulsory activities, using three categories: K1 no AI use, K2 specified AI use, and K3 full AI use aligned with NMBU AI guidelines.
9+Evidence (nb, 4556959d8fbc): I emnebeskrivelsen skal det stå informasjon om tillatt bruk av KI i emnet. Dette feltet skal inneholde en beskrivelse av hvordan KI er tillatt brukt ved de forskjellige vurderingsformene og de obligatoriske aktivitetene som emnet har. Det er 3 mulige kategorier av KI-bruk.
10+privacy: NMBU's Norwegian student guidance tells students not to use AI to process personal data or sensitive matters.
11+Evidence (nb, 4556959d8fbc): Det er viktig å: bruke KI som støtte, ikke som erstatning for egen tenkning; kritisk vurdere kvaliteten på svarene du får; alltid oppgi bruk av KI i akademiske arbeider og merk tydelig materiale generert av språkmodeller; ikke bruke KI til å behandle personopplysninger eller sensitive saker.
12+academic_integrity: NMBU's Norwegian cheating and plagiarism page warns that incorrect or improper use of AI tools such as ChatGPT can create suspicion of attempted cheating and/or plagiarism, with possible consequences including annulment and exclusion.
13+Evidence (nb, 2d4d3862a0ca): Husk at feil bruk av kunstig intelligens (KI)/artificial intelligence (AI) som eks. ChatGPT eller andre kan medføre mistanke om forsøk på fusk og/eller plagiering. Dette kan få alvorlige konsekvenser for deg.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

6 声明 条记录

academic_integrity

NMBU's Norwegian cheating and plagiarism page warns that incorrect or improper use of AI tools such as ChatGPT can create suspicion of attempted cheating and/or plagiarism, with possible consequences including annulment and exclusion.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度89%证据1语言nb

privacy

NMBU's Norwegian student guidance tells students not to use AI to process personal data or sensitive matters.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言nb

ai_tool_treatment

NMBU student guidance says each course description should state permitted AI use for assessment and compulsory activities, using three categories: K1 no AI use, K2 specified AI use, and K3 full AI use aligned with NMBU AI guidelines.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%证据1语言nb

ai_tool_treatment

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs will normally not be permitted in written examinations on campus; for take-home exams, students must follow the AI-use specifications in the exam paper and course description.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

NMBU's generative AI guidelines require students to clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used, and to account for AI use in assignments or other work submitted for assessment or compulsory activity.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%证据1语言en

ai_tool_treatment

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs are permitted in accordance with the guidelines, while individual course descriptions may state that AI-based programs are not permitted for exams or other assessed work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据1语言en

源快照

4 source attributions