Pullman, United States

Washington State University

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

8 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for Washington State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance97%

Valeur normalisée: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat","description":"WSU provides standard Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat to all students, faculty, and staff through the university enterprise account.","howToObtain":"Use the standard Copilot Chat through WSU's enterprise account.","costToUser":"Free access for WSU users.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The standard Copilot Chat service all students, faculty and staff currently receive as part of the university’s enterprise account. All WSU users continue to have free access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat.

Affichage localisé only

The standard Copilot Chat service all students, faculty and staff currently receive as part of the university’s enterprise account. All WSU users continue to have free access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat.

Enseignement

WSU Provost guidance expects every instructor to set clear acceptable-AI-use expectations and to state the AI course policy in every class syllabus.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance96%

Valeur normalisée: every_instructor_expected_to_state_ai_course_policy_in_syllabus

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The Office of the Provost expects every instructor to set clear expectations and policies related to acceptable AI use in their course(s). Instructors must clearly indicate their course policy about AI use in every class syllabus, and potentially, for each and every assessment.

Academic Integrity

WSU Provost guidance says WSU does not endorse AI detection tools and will not allow any AI detector to be the sole support for an academic misconduct case.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%

Valeur normalisée: ai_detector_not_sole_support_for_academic_misconduct_case

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Currently, WSU does not endorse the use of any AI detection tool for several reasons. ... We will continue our policy of not allowing the use of any AI detector as the sole source of support for a case against a student for academic misconduct in the future.

Ai Tool Treatment

WSU Provost guidance says instructors may allow or prohibit generative AI tools for their courses, with an obligation to communicate the course AI policy clearly to enrolled students.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%

Valeur normalisée: instructors_may_allow_or_prohibit_generative_ai_with_clear_communication

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Therefore, it is the instructor's prerogative to allow or prohibit the use of any generative AI tool. This decision comes with the obligation to accurately and clearly communicate AI policies to students enrolled in WSU courses across all campuses.

Confidentialité

WSU Provost AI-related policy guidance says Executive Policy 8 prohibits putting legally protected or regulated data, including proprietary, personally identifiable, HIPAA, or FERPA data, into generative AI platform queries.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%

Valeur normalisée: protected_or_regulated_data_prohibited_in_generative_ai_queries

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Executive Policy 8 prohibits the inclusion of legally protected or regulated data (e.g., proprietary, personally identifiable information, HIPAA, FERPA) in queries provided to generative AI platforms like ChatGPT.

Recherche

WSU Office of Research guidance says researchers should generally not input sensitive data into externally sourced generative AI tools because such tools are unlikely to meet WSU data security policy requirements.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%

Valeur normalisée: researchers_generally_should_not_input_sensitive_data_into_external_gai_tools

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Third-party software, tools, or information storage systems must comply with WSU data security policies. Because GAI tools are unlikely to meet these requirements, researchers should generally not input sensitive data into externally sourced GAI tools.

Academic Integrity

WSU Provost guidance states that students are expected to provide accurate and transparent attribution of AI use in classroom assessments.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%

Valeur normalisée: students_expected_to_attribute_ai_use_in_classroom_assessments

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
An expectation for our students is that there is accurate and transparent attribution of AI use in their classroom assessments.

Recherche

WSU Office of Research guidance recommends upholding academic integrity in research by clearly attributing the use of generative AI tools in research outputs and publications.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance92%

Valeur normalisée: research_outputs_should_clearly_attribute_gai_tool_use

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Uphold standards of academic integrity by clearly attributing the use of GAI tools in research outputs and publications.

Source record

Sources officielles

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance97%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Washington State University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/washington-state-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert