Policy presence
University of California, Davis has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Davis, United States
University of California, Davis
University of California, Davis has 12 source-backed AI policy claims from 8 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 12 reviewed claims. Last checked May 23, 2026.
University of California, Davis AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of California, Davis has 12 source-backed AI policy claims from 8 official source attributions, including 12 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 23, 2026. Discovery context: University of California, Davis is listed as QS 2026 rank =114.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of California, Davis as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 23, 2026 and last changed on May 23, 2026. The record contains 12 source-backed claims, including 12 reviewed claims, from 8 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-california-davis.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Procurement claims.
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Evidence includes Other policy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of California, Davis has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of California, Davis has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of California, Davis has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of California, Davis has 5 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of California, Davis has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
University of California, Davis has 5 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of California, Davis has 5 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of California, Davis has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of California, Davis has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
University of California, Davis has 3 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
12 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
UC Davis guidance says users should not enter sensitive UC Davis data, including student, personnel, patient, confidential research, or financial account information, into AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Do not enter sensitive UC Davis data into AI tools.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Do not enter sensitive UC Davis data—such as student records, personnel information, patient data, confidential research findings, or financial account details—into AI tools.
Academic Integrity
The UC Davis School of Medicine policy says medical students may not use generative AI to directly author submitted assignments or generate answers for closed-book assessments unless faculty or course leadership gives written permission.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: School of Medicine GenAI coursework use requires faculty or course leadership permission for direct authorship or closed-book assessment answers.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1GenAI may not be used to directly author any portion of a submitted assignment unless faculty or course leadership grants written permission.
Ai Tool Treatment
UC Davis guidance tells UC Davis and UC Davis Health community members to use UC Davis-approved AI platforms, or UC Davis-developed tools, for university work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Use UC Davis-approved or UC Davis-developed AI tools for university work.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Use the UC Davis–approved versions of AI platforms—or tools developed by UC Davis—for university work.
Academic Integrity
UC Davis guidance tells students to confirm with instructors before using AI in coursework and not to use AI to complete assignments unless explicitly permitted.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Students should confirm instructor permission before coursework AI use.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Students: Confirm with your instructors before using AI in coursework. Do not use AI to complete assignments unless explicitly permitted.
Privacy
The UC Davis School of Medicine policy says medical students are not permitted to use external generative AI tools for patient care documentation except as allowed under UC Davis Health policy, and PHI must not be entered into a generative AI tool outside a secure institutionally supported system.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: School of Medicine bars external GenAI patient-care documentation uses except under UC Davis Health policy and bars PHI outside secure supported systems.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Under no circumstances should PHI be entered into any generative AI tool outside of a secure, institutionally supported system.
Procurement
UC Davis guidance says AI tools used for Administration and Services responsibilities require committee review and approval before campus or health departments proceed with procurement.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Administration and Services AI tools require review and approval before departmental procurement.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1All AI tools for use in carrying out Administration and Services responsibilities require review and approval by the Committee before departments at campus and health locations are permitted to proceed with procuring the AI tool.
Privacy
UC Davis Health guidance says generative AI tools should not be used with patient information or other sensitive data unless the tool is specifically approved by UC Davis Health.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: UC Davis Health restricts GenAI use with patient information or sensitive data to specifically approved tools.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Generative AI tools have the potential to be helpful, but UC Davis Health has restrictions on their use to protect patient privacy and data security. You should not be used generative AI tools with any patient information or other sensitive data unless the tool is specifically approved by the UC Davis Health.
Security Review
UC Davis Health says users should consult their supervisor and the UC Davis Health Analytics Oversight Committee before using a generative AI tool.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: UC Davis Health says users should consult their supervisor and the UC Davis Health Analytics Oversight Committee before using a generative AI tool.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1As always consult with your supervisor and the UC Davis Health Analytics Oversight Committee before using a generative AI tool.
Other
UC Davis Health warns that even approved generative AI tools may produce inaccurate or biased outputs.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: UC Davis Health warns that even approved generative AI tools may produce inaccurate or biased outputs.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Even with approved tools, you should be careful about the information you provide and the output you receive, as generative AI may not be accurate and may reflect biases.
Privacy
UC Davis IET states that Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is available at no additional cost to UC Davis and UC Davis Health students, faculty, and staff, but sensitive data should not be uploaded without a Vendor Risk Assessment.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is available to UC Davis and UC Davis Health users; sensitive data requires VRA before upload.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is an AI-powered chat for writing, coding, and image creation. It is free for UC Davis and UC Davis Health students, faculty, and staff. Institutional data is encrypted and protected, but sensitive data should not be uploaded without a Vendor Risk Assessment.
Ai Tool Treatment
The UC Davis Aggie AI tools page lists multiple AI tools available through UC Davis, with availability varying by tool and audience.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: UC Davis publishes an Aggie AI tools list with tool-specific availability.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1The following tools are available through Aggie AI. Rocky AI Chat is available to UC Davis and UC Davis Health students, faculty and staff at no cost. Zoom AI Companion is available at no cost to UC Davis students, faculty and staff. Google Gemini is available to UC Davis campus students, faculty and staff in the UC Davis Google Workspace. Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is available to UC Davis and UC Davis Health students, faculty, and staff at no cost.
Teaching
UC Davis Center for Educational Effectiveness teaching guidance advises instructors to have explicit, transparent, and consistent AI policies and to talk with students about how, when, and why they can use generative AI tools in a course.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: CEE advises explicit course AI policies and clear student communication.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Have an explicit, transparent, and consistent AI policy. Talk with students about how, when, and why they can use GenAI tools in your course.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
8 source attribution
Acceptable Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Coursework Policy
health.ucdavis.edu
AI Guidance
iet.ucdavis.edu
AI Tools
iet.ucdavis.edu
Generative AI and Teaching
cee.ucdavis.edu
Guidelines for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence
health.ucdavis.edu
Guidelines for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence
health.ucdavis.edu
Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat
iet.ucdavis.edu
UC Davis Student Guide to Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)
iet.ucdavis.edu
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.