Policy presence
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Los Angeles, United States
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 11, 2026.
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 11, 2026. Discovery context: University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) is listed as QS 2026 rank 46.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 11, 2026 and last changed on May 11, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/ucla.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
UCLA Academic Senate guidance quotes the Student Conduct Code requirement that submissions must be the student’s own work or clearly acknowledge the source, and says that unless an instructor indicates otherwise, use of ChatGPT or other AI tools for course assignments is akin to receiving assistance from another person.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Student submissions must be own work or acknowledge sources; unless instructors indicate otherwise, ChatGPT or other AI tool use is treated as assistance from another person.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1The UCLA Student Conduct Code states, “Unless otherwise specified by the faculty member, all submissions, whether in draft or final form, to meet course requirements (including a paper, project, exam, computer program, oral presentation, or other work) must either be the Student’s own work, or must clearly acknowledge the source.” Unless an instructor indicates otherwise, the use of ChatGPT or other AI tools for course assignments is akin to receiving assistance from another person
Affichage localise only
UCLA Academic Senate guidance quotes the Student Conduct Code and states that submissions must be the student’s own work or clearly acknowledge sources; unless an instructor says otherwise, ChatGPT or similar AI tool use for course assignments is treated like assistance from another person.
Privacy
UCLA DTS guidance says users may not input FERPA-protected student information, HIPPA/HIPAA-protected health data, employee personnel/performance data, unpublished research/IP/grant proposals, or export-controlled or restricted data into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Restricted data categories may not be input into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Users may not input the following into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment: ( any questions regarding the below, please use grc@ucla.edu as the intake email for your questions) FERPA-protected student information (IDs, grades, coursework, etc) – UCLA Registrar FERPA Policy HIPPA-protected health data – UCLA Health HIPAA Notice Employee personnel/performance data – UC IS-3 Information Security Policy Unpublished research, IP, or grant proposals – UC Copyright & IP Policy Export-controlled or restricted data – UCLA Export Control Guidance
Affichage localise only
UCLA DTS guidance says users may not input listed sensitive data categories into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment.
Ai Tool Treatment
UCLA DTS AI guidance lists a subset of available generative AI tools including Microsoft Copilot and M365 Copilot, Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise, Google Notebook LM, AWS Bedrock models, and Zoom AI Companion.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: DTS lists available GenAI tools including Copilot, Gemini, ChatGPT Enterprise, Notebook LM, AWS Bedrock models, and Zoom AI Companion.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Please visit the linked page for most up to date tools, a subset of which is listed below: Microsoft Copilot & M365 Copilot Google Gemini (and Gemini for Workspace) OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise Google Notebook LM AWS Bedrock models (Amazon Q, PartyRock, Claude, LLaMA, etc.) Zoom AI Companion (Education license)
Affichage localise only
UCLA DTS says its linked tools page has the most up-to-date tool list and lists a subset including Copilot, Gemini, ChatGPT Enterprise, Notebook LM, AWS Bedrock models, and Zoom AI Companion.
Teaching
UCLA Academic Senate guidance encourages instructors to clarify and communicate expectations to students and to consider incorporating academic integrity policies into the syllabus.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Instructors are encouraged to communicate AI expectations and consider syllabus academic integrity policies.
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Instructors are encouraged to clarify and communicate expectations to students • Consider incorporating academic integrity policies into your syllabus
Affichage localise only
UCLA Academic Senate guidance encourages instructors to communicate expectations to students and consider adding academic integrity policies to the syllabus.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
AI Use and Recommendation Guide
dts.ucla.edu
Guiding Principles for Responsible Use
dts.ucla.edu
Teaching Guidance for ChatGPT and Related AI Developments
senate.ucla.edu
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.