Policy presence
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Singapore, Singapore
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore)
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 7 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 7 reviewed claims. Last checked May 5, 2026.
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 7 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions, including 7 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 5, 2026. Discovery context: Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) is listed as QS 2026 rank 12.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 5, 2026 and last changed on May 6, 2026. The record contains 7 source-backed claims, including 7 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/nanyang-technological-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 97%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Research
NTU states that generative AI should not be listed as an author of any paper with NTU affiliation, or as a Principal Investigator, Co-PI, or collaborator in research proposals.
Review: Agent reviewed
Evidence originale
Evidence 1GenAI (e.g. ChatGPT) should not be listed as an author of any paper with an affiliation to NTU; or listed as a Principal Investigator (PI), Co-PI, or collaborator in any research proposals.
Research
NTU states that the use of generative AI beyond basic spelling and grammar checks should be acknowledged and cited in research outputs, publications, and presentations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Evidence originale
Evidence 1In the interests of transparency and integrity, the use of GenAI beyond basic spelling and grammar checks should be appropriately acknowledged and cited. This would include acknowledging the use of any AI tools in their research proposals, manuscripts, and scholarly works through a statement specifying the tool's full name and version, its purpose of use, and how it was used.
Academic Integrity
NTU states that not citing or acknowledging the use of generative AI could be considered plagiarism (a form of research misconduct), especially if GenAI was used to generate ideas or for literature reviews.
Review: Agent reviewed
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Not citing or acknowledging the use of GenAI could be considered plagiarism (i.e. a form of research misconduct), especially if GenAI was used to generate ideas or for literature reviews.
Privacy
NTU prohibits uploading confidential, sensitive, or personal data to external generative AI platforms unless specific conditions are met: legal compliance, restricted access, no data retention, and written permission from data owners.
Review: Agent reviewed
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Any confidential or sensitive information, and/or personal data must not be uploaded to any external GenAI software, system, or platform unless: The activity does not contravene any applicable laws, regulations, or institutional policies; Access to the GenAI is controlled and restricted to only authorised study members; The data is not retained in or by the GenAI; and Where applicable, written permission has been explicitly provided by the data owner.
Academic Integrity
NTU states that misrepresenting AI-generated content as one's own work is considered academic misconduct under the 2025 NTU Academic Integrity Handbook.
Review: Agent reviewed
Evidence originale
Evidence 1AI tools can assist your thinking but should not replace it; misrepresenting AI-generated content as your own work is considered academic misconduct.
Teaching
NTU guidelines state that AI detector tools should be used with caution due to frequent false positives and negatives, ease of bypass, and bias against non-native English writing patterns.
Review: Agent reviewed
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Research shows that the use of AI detector tools should be used with caution due to the following reasons. Unreliable Detection: Frequent false positives (human text flagged as AI) and false negatives (AI text missed). ... Discrimination: Bias against non-native writing patterns (e.g. ESL/EFL students).
Teaching
NTU requires students to disclose the use of AI tools in their submissions and to always refer to their module's AI use policy for specific expectations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Use AI tools to support tasks such as brainstorming, outlining, or checking grammar, but ensure you disclose their use in your submissions. Always refer to your module's AI use policy and seek guidance from your instructor regarding specific expectations for acceptable AI usage in your courses.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
NTU Policy on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Research
ntu.edu.sg
Policies & Guidelines - NTU Singapore
ntu.edu.sg
Using AI Discovery Tools Responsibly
libguides.ntu.edu.sg
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.