research
NTU states that the use of generative AI beyond basic spelling and grammar checks should be acknowledged and cited in research outputs, publications, and presentations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore)
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 6, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
7 claim records
research
NTU states that generative AI should not be listed as an author of any paper with NTU affiliation, or as a Principal Investigator, Co-PI, or collaborator in research proposals.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
NTU states that not citing or acknowledging the use of generative AI could be considered plagiarism (a form of research misconduct), especially if GenAI was used to generate ideas or for literature reviews.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
NTU prohibits uploading confidential, sensitive, or personal data to external generative AI platforms unless specific conditions are met: legal compliance, restricted access, no data retention, and written permission from data owners.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
NTU states that misrepresenting AI-generated content as one's own work is considered academic misconduct under the 2025 NTU Academic Integrity Handbook.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
NTU guidelines state that AI detector tools should be used with caution due to frequent false positives and negatives, ease of bypass, and bias against non-native English writing patterns.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
NTU requires students to disclose the use of AI tools in their submissions and to always refer to their module's AI use policy for specific expectations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
3 source attributions
NTU Policy on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Research
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 5, 2026, 10:11 PM
Policies & Guidelines - NTU Singapore
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 5, 2026, 10:11 PM
Using AI Discovery Tools Responsibly
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 5, 2026, 10:11 PM