Policy presence
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Singapore, Singapore
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Research
Original evidence
Evidence 1GenAI (e.g. ChatGPT) should not be listed as an author of any paper with an affiliation to NTU; or listed as a Principal Investigator (PI), Co-PI, or collaborator in any research proposals.
Research
Original evidence
Evidence 1In the interests of transparency and integrity, the use of GenAI beyond basic spelling and grammar checks should be appropriately acknowledged and cited. This would include acknowledging the use of any AI tools in their research proposals, manuscripts, and scholarly works through a statement specifying the tool's full name and version, its purpose of use, and how it was used.
Academic Integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Not citing or acknowledging the use of GenAI could be considered plagiarism (i.e. a form of research misconduct), especially if GenAI was used to generate ideas or for literature reviews.
Privacy
Original evidence
Evidence 1Any confidential or sensitive information, and/or personal data must not be uploaded to any external GenAI software, system, or platform unless: The activity does not contravene any applicable laws, regulations, or institutional policies; Access to the GenAI is controlled and restricted to only authorised study members; The data is not retained in or by the GenAI; and Where applicable, written permission has been explicitly provided by the data owner.
Academic Integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI tools can assist your thinking but should not replace it; misrepresenting AI-generated content as your own work is considered academic misconduct.
Teaching
Original evidence
Evidence 1Research shows that the use of AI detector tools should be used with caution due to the following reasons. Unreliable Detection: Frequent false positives (human text flagged as AI) and false negatives (AI text missed). ... Discrimination: Bias against non-native writing patterns (e.g. ESL/EFL students).
Teaching
Original evidence
Evidence 1Use AI tools to support tasks such as brainstorming, outlining, or checking grammar, but ensure you disclose their use in your submissions. Always refer to your module's AI use policy and seek guidance from your instructor regarding specific expectations for acceptable AI usage in your courses.
0 machine or needs-review claim
3 source attribution
ntu.edu.sg
ntu.edu.sg
libguides.ntu.edu.sg