Singapore, Singapore Last checked

Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore)

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Follow course and assignment rules

NTU’s 2025 statement generally permits assignment AI use, with teacher prohibitions for pedagogical reasons. Current Library guidance requires module instructions and explicit permission for extensive use.

Official source ↗

Exams

Check external-resource restrictions

Do not access AI during exams where external resources are forbidden. Check the exact examination instructions; open-resource exams do not automatically authorise AI.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Disclose use; check the required detail

Disclose AI assistance in submissions and follow module requirements. Detailed prompt/output records and the format depend on the instructor; thesis submissions have a separate Statement of Originality requirement.

Official source ↗

Privacy & sensitive data

All research safeguards apply

Do not upload protected research data to external GenAI unless legal, restricted-access and no-retention conditions are met, plus owner permission where applicable or RCA agreement. The RCA route does not waive the other safeguards.

Official source ↗

Approved tools

Undergraduate access; course limits apply

NTU announced Google AI tools for undergraduates from August 2026; NALA tutors are deployed by educators. Personal account access and costs were not tested. Access does not grant assessment permission.

Official source ↗

Research & publication

Disclose, verify and preserve research integrity

Acknowledge research use beyond basic spelling/grammar checks, retain human authorship and follow stricter recipient rules. Label and document AI visuals; experimental images have explicit methodology exceptions, not permission to fabricate results.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Misrepresentation and research processes differ

Misrepresenting AI work is academic misconduct in the Library’s handbook summary. Research plagiarism and research-misconduct referral have their own conditions; referral is not guilt or an automatic sanction.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Clarify use before the task

Consult instructor and assignment guidance before using AI. Extensive AI involvement requires explicit instructor permission under the Library guidance.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Check service and data approval

Research data conditions are explicit. The obtained public sources do not establish a complete university-wide procurement process or approval of every service for protected data.

Official source ↗

Before you submit

Do

  • Check module instructions and obtain permission for extensive AI involvement.
    Site advice
  • Follow the instructor’s disclosure and process-record requirements.
    Site advice
  • Label and document AI-generated research visuals.
    Requirement in this scope

Don’t

  • Do not access AI in exams that forbid external resources.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Do not treat RCA authorization as waiving other research-data safeguards.
    Site advice
  • Do not fabricate experimental results using AI images.
    Requirement in this scope

AI use questioned?

Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore)

Read each cited rule for its course, academic unit, activity and exceptions. Site advice does not create a university obligation.

Investigation & response

The Vice President (Research) reviews the RIO preliminary report and may take appropriate action, decide whether to invite the Provost to appoint a COI for faculty/research staff, or decide whether to refer a student to the Board of Discipline. This is a research-misconduct process, not an automatic AI penalty or a finding of guilt.

Original evidence and scope

The Vice President (Research) reviews the RIO preliminary report and may take appropriate action, decide whether to invite the Provost to appoint a COI for faculty/research staff, or decide whether to refer a student to the Board of Discipline. This is a research-misconduct process, not an automatic AI penalty or a finding of guilt.

clm-ntu-research-misconduct-referral
4.4.1 The Vice President (Research) shall review the preliminary investigation report from the RIO, who will then take appropriate action (especially in relation to research staff), or decide whether to invite the Provost to appoint a COI to consider the Allegation/ Complaint under the Framework for Investigation and Disciplinary Proceedings for Faculty and Research Staff, or if the Respondent is a student, decide whether to refer to the Board of Discipline, or take any other appropriate action.

Research misconduct procedures §4.4.1; normalized extracted text; Unicode codepoints 15628:16128

Official university source ↗

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

AI tools & access

  • Gemini EnterpriseOfficial recommendationConditions apply

    Official announcement covers all NTU undergraduates from August 2026; current individual account activation and licence conditions were not independently tested. Follow assessment instructions separately.

  • Google AI StudioOfficial recommendationConditions apply

    Official announcement covers all NTU undergraduates from August 2026; current individual account activation and licence conditions were not independently tested. Follow assessment instructions separately.

  • Vertex AIOfficial recommendationConditions apply

    Official announcement covers all NTU undergraduates from August 2026; current individual account activation and licence conditions were not independently tested. Follow assessment instructions separately.

  • NTU AI Learning Assistant (NALA)Official recommendationConditions apply

    Educators build and deploy course tutors; availability depends on the applicable course. This does not grant general assessment permission.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Held / removed from current conclusions · Record addition · Site correction

    Coursework · Exams · 8 more topics · Records involved: 22 (10 corrected / adjusted · 11 added · 1 held)

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

21

Held conclusions and historical evidence (1)

These original records and prior review states are retained for provenance, not as current permissions, duties or precise deadlines.

NTU guidelines state that AI detector tools should be used with caution due to frequent false positives and negatives, ease of bypass, and bias against non-native English writing patterns.

Current status: held; historical review state: agent_reviewed

clm-ntu-ai-detectors-unreliable

Research shows that the use of AI detector tools should be used with caution due to the following reasons. Unreliable Detection: Frequent false positives (human text flagged as AI) and false negatives (AI text missed). ... Discrimination: Bias against non-native writing patterns (e.g. ESL/EFL students).

Official sources

8 official URLs; 8 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

NTU Policy on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Research | Research | NTU Singapore

www.ntu.edu.sg

University official source

Nanyang Technological University

Hash and captured version

NTU Policy on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Research | Research | NTU Singapore · 2026-10-15T01:04:35.341879Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

39a6a8a5f50307324c00d70aeadf97f684c3e68f140d68466ea6acb75c20afac

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Empowering students to thrive in the age of AI | NTU Singapore

www.ntu.edu.sg

University official source

Nanyang Technological University

Hash and captured version

Empowering students to thrive in the age of AI | NTU Singapore · 2026-10-15T01:04:35.004449Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

ca9f7daee08476a9229ec551c697d9485aef81686882d3cc5be9448b42cd92c7

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Introduction - Using AI Discovery Tools Responsibly - LibGuides at Nanyang Technological University

libguides.ntu.edu.sg

University official source

Nanyang Technological University

Hash and captured version

Introduction - Using AI Discovery Tools Responsibly - LibGuides at Nanyang Technological University · 2026-10-15T01:04:35.890468Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

45e70af98002b8124ce8488484b81938476240fa3f781c35b697f8057b0b6f87

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Document, Disclose & Cite AI Usage - Using AI Discovery Tools Responsibly - LibGuides at Nanyang Technological University

libguides.ntu.edu.sg

University official source

Nanyang Technological University

Hash and captured version

Document, Disclose & Cite AI Usage - Using AI Discovery Tools Responsibly - LibGuides at Nanyang Technological University · 2026-10-15T01:04:36.472175Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

acbd02dfd7f893f894356bd47d305ff3e1006572f8b6525ecf90d8bccaad1078

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Theses / Dissertations | Research | NTU Singapore

www.ntu.edu.sg

University official source

Nanyang Technological University

Hash and captured version

Theses / Dissertations | Research | NTU Singapore · 2026-10-15T01:04:36.191828Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

74c441fc06c1021c0a9596ddeef024ed240e00df2aec73009ceb5e66890d5f40

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Guidelines for Responsible Use - Using AI Discovery Tools Responsibly - LibGuides at Nanyang Technological University

libguides.ntu.edu.sg

University official source

Nanyang Technological University

Hash and captured version

Guidelines for Responsible Use - Using AI Discovery Tools Responsibly - LibGuides at Nanyang Technological University · 2026-10-15T01:04:36.070191Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

c52c5d4e9c35ab962a9a21d6ca62f6144aa47bae58a71ed1f1e071139b265731

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Comment on the use of AI in education | NTU Singapore

www.ntu.edu.sg

University official source

Nanyang Technological University

Hash and captured version

Comment on the use of AI in education | NTU Singapore · 2026-10-15T01:12:19.289409Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

1cd4e5461d67408d62134754d22e02049d8eee23988dce1a4761eda594752914

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Responding to Allegations/ Complaints of Research Misconduct | Research | NTU Singapore

www.ntu.edu.sg

University official source

Nanyang Technological University

Hash and captured version

Responding to Allegations/ Complaints of Research Misconduct | Research | NTU Singapore · 2026-10-15T01:12:19.718334Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

52483742862710f93cff8dfd6dc27dcb9d34e74982f64ef3d62f3e646265cb21

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
v6-ntu-chicago-20261014-r2
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • The complete 2025 Academic Integrity Handbook and internal teaching policy were not obtained; public Library summaries retain their own authority.
  • The original AI-detector guidance URL returns 404; no current replacement covering all historical assertions was obtained. The original claim is held in history, not treated as withdrawn policy.
  • Google tool access is verified as an undergraduate announcement, not as a live personal account activation or assessment permission.
  • Course-specific exam rules and complete disciplinary/appeal procedures remain unverified.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        NTU’s 2025 statement generally permits assignment AI use, with teacher prohibitions for pedagogical reasons. Current Library guidance requires module instructions and explicit permission for extensive use.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        Disclose AI assistance in submissions and follow module requirements. Detailed prompt/output records and the format depend on the instructor; thesis submissions have a separate Statement of Originality requirement.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        Do not upload protected research data to external GenAI unless legal, restricted-access and no-retention conditions are met, plus owner permission where applicable or RCA agreement. The RCA route does not waive the other safeguards.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        NTU announced Google AI tools for undergraduates from August 2026; NALA tutors are deployed by educators. Personal account access and costs were not tested. Access does not grant assessment permission.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        Do not access AI during exams where external resources are forbidden. Check the exact examination instructions; open-resource exams do not automatically authorise AI.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        Acknowledge research use beyond basic spelling/grammar checks, retain human authorship and follow stricter recipient rules. Label and document AI visuals; experimental images have explicit methodology exceptions, not permission to fabricate results.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        Misrepresenting AI work is academic misconduct in the Library’s handbook summary. Research plagiarism and research-misconduct referral have their own conditions; referral is not guilt or an automatic sanction.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        Consult instructor and assignment guidance before using AI. Extensive AI involvement requires explicit instructor permission under the Library guidance.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        Research data conditions are explicit. The obtained public sources do not establish a complete university-wide procurement process or approval of every service for protected data.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        21 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →