Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Singapore, Singapore
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) is listed as QS 2026 rank 12. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
v1 public contract
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) is listed as QS 2026 rank 12. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Candidate claims are source-backed records pending review. They are not final policy conclusions and are not legal or academic integrity advice.
7 reviewed public claim
Research
Original evidence
Evidence 1GenAI (e.g. ChatGPT) should not be listed as an author of any paper with an affiliation to NTU; or listed as a Principal Investigator (PI), Co-PI, or collaborator in any research proposals.
Research
Original evidence
Evidence 1In the interests of transparency and integrity, the use of GenAI beyond basic spelling and grammar checks should be appropriately acknowledged and cited. This would include acknowledging the use of any AI tools in their research proposals, manuscripts, and scholarly works through a statement specifying the tool's full name and version, its purpose of use, and how it was used.
Academic Integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Not citing or acknowledging the use of GenAI could be considered plagiarism (i.e. a form of research misconduct), especially if GenAI was used to generate ideas or for literature reviews.
Privacy
Original evidence
Evidence 1Any confidential or sensitive information, and/or personal data must not be uploaded to any external GenAI software, system, or platform unless: The activity does not contravene any applicable laws, regulations, or institutional policies; Access to the GenAI is controlled and restricted to only authorised study members; The data is not retained in or by the GenAI; and Where applicable, written permission has been explicitly provided by the data owner.
Academic Integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI tools can assist your thinking but should not replace it; misrepresenting AI-generated content as your own work is considered academic misconduct.
Teaching
Original evidence
Evidence 1Research shows that the use of AI detector tools should be used with caution due to the following reasons. Unreliable Detection: Frequent false positives (human text flagged as AI) and false negatives (AI text missed). ... Discrimination: Bias against non-native writing patterns (e.g. ESL/EFL students).
Teaching
Original evidence
Evidence 1Use AI tools to support tasks such as brainstorming, outlining, or checking grammar, but ensure you disclose their use in your submissions. Always refer to your module's AI use policy and seek guidance from your instructor regarding specific expectations for acceptable AI usage in your courses.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
3 source attribution
ntu.edu.sg
ntu.edu.sg
libguides.ntu.edu.sg